Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:OSS Rocks! (Score 1) 179

by jeti (#38874999) Attached to: Rockbox Developers Talk Open Source Firmware

If you have a look at the supported players, you'll see that the supported models tend to be quite old. The Rockbox project took long to get where it is. And its functionality is limited to pure audio playback. By now, any players with a screen support additional features like video playback or Wifi support. The features that Rockbox offers are well implemented, but the project never offered what marketing demanded at the time.

Comment: Re:OSS Rocks! (Score 4, Informative) 179

by jeti (#38863863) Attached to: Rockbox Developers Talk Open Source Firmware

I once worked for a company like the one that provided your cheap mp3 player. There were several reasons for not being more open:
1. The only legal music stores at that time insisted on DRM, which is largely incompatible with open source.
2. Chip manufacturers only provide drivers in binary form. They also have extensive confidentiality agreements that made it impossible to release relevant code produced by us.
3. Documenting and cleaning up code, reviewing licenses and releasing or integrating code is a considerable workload and has to be justifiable. I think people overestimate the resources that small companies can spend on firmware. The firmware for some of our products was implemented by three or four people.
4. Our boss hated the idea that our competitors could get a leg up by using software that he paid for being developed.

Be frank and explicit with your lawyer ... it is his business to confuse the issue afterwards.

Working...