Comment Re:And as usual you can't Google (Score 1) 42
Next time, spend more than 60 seconds looking, because that doesn't say anything that helps your case.
Next time, spend more than 60 seconds looking, because that doesn't say anything that helps your case.
You are 120% wrong, as usual. The US has nothing like this, and will prosecute companies that try to do it:
But the Chinese government decided to take a more aggressive approach by allowing private industry to conduct cyberattacks and hacking campaigns on their own, U.S. officials said.
How did the stock market get into this discussion?
And the list concept concerns me. Are these lists appealable? If not, then they're abusable.
Also, the line between "AI generated" and "non-AI generated" is ever more fuzzy. AI is used for upscaling. AI is used in cameras to enhance images taken. AI is used to make the sort of minor edits that are done the world over in Photoshop. Etc. There's also the fact that this is done with image fingerprinting, which is fuzzy, so then any images that have minor modifications done with AI which get added to the list will get the raw images flagged as well. The thing people want to stop is "fake images", and in particular, "fake images that mislead about the topic at hand". But then that's not "AI" that's the problem in specific, that's image fakery in general (AI just makes it faster / easier).
And re: fingerprinting, take for example, the famous case of the content-spam creator who took a photo of a woodcarving of a German Shepard, flipped it horizontally, ran it through an AI engine to make trivial tweaks to the image, and then listed it as his own. I'd think any decent fingerprinting software would catch both versions. And if it's not flexible enough to catch that, then I have to wonder how useful it is at all, since images constantly change as they move around the internet, even accidentally, let alone deliberately.
I don't understand why English needs both flammable and inflammable.
Because it does not mean the same.
As usual, you are wrong: https://www.merriam-webster.co...
The first public jumbotron trouble that I can remember is in Ferris Buellers Day Off.
Fine. DVDs and Blue-ray. Regardless, the point stands. It's a physical medium you own.
I know there are people who will grumble and whine that DVDs are sooooooo outdated, but this is another example of why they are superior. You never have to worry someone else will take it away from you.
You bought it. You own it. Unless someone breaks into your home and takes it or your home burns down, it is yours forever. You can watch it as many times as you like whenever you want. You are not restricted to someone else's schedule. Nor do you have to worry about it breaking up because the signal got botched.
Further, DVDs don't change. No one can alter the movie with "new and improved" scenes or added "features". Han will always shoot first.
That Microsoft has told users there are no refunds is further justification why DVDs are better than streaming.
This is the other part: not all computer science programs are equal. 25 years ago, my university basically created it as a "managing programmers and technologist education" concept, the idea being no one with a college degree was going to do any actual programming in the future. So it was very light on hard technology and very heavy on what was basically MBA prep. If you wanted to do information theory or data science, you were in ECE or a math major. You might touch on all the same concepts as a better program in another university, but you weren't going to be exploring them in depth, or advancing the field.
Other schools had different ideas, and CS was a very strong technical program. You learned to code as a side effect of having to do it so much to support the coursework, which needed programming to explore the concepts.
I hear the culture of fear is very real, and additionally has created a pretty uncooperative, hostile environment as everyone hoards knowledge. How about trimming executive salaries a lot? They're clearly worthless.
How many "homes for a year" does that equal?
Or maybe it reflects the intermittency of wind: one hour you're generating 30 kW, the next you're generating bupkis.
WHAT is right there on video? That is NOT one of Zelensky's bodyguards. That's a random soldier from the 25th Separate Secheslav Airborne Brigade, which recaptured Izyum, during Zelensky's visit to celebrate the victory. Do you think bodyguards spend all their time taking selfies with the person they're protecting? Grow some common sense circuits in your brain. And it's not like Zelensky was handing the man an award with the patch prominently featured in front of the camera while he received it or anything. The Russian volunteer ranks are absolutely littered with Nazis.
Using TSO is like kicking a dead whale down the beach. -- S.C. Johnson