Comment Re:Still going? (Score 1) 9
Honestly don't even worry about it, instead go back and play the 2016 Doom, it's the best of the reboot series. Ton of fun and the soundtrack is killer.
Honestly don't even worry about it, instead go back and play the 2016 Doom, it's the best of the reboot series. Ton of fun and the soundtrack is killer.
there is only one working solution, and it is to prevent concentration of power, including financial power.
but in the trumpistan this is called "Communism" and is DoA, so the winning bet is nothing will change.
This article is textbook misinformation.
Read the title and the only quote referenced from the declassified document is: “These officials highlighted that, prior to the visit (from Joe Biden), the Poroshenko administration and other Ukrainian officials expected the U.S. Vice President to discuss personal matters with Poroshenko during the visit, and had assumed that the U.S. Vice President would advocate in support or against specific officials within the Ukrainian government”.
Then they quote some op-ed's and some private intelligence analysts but it's all just words from people, unsubstantiated. Then they get the conclusion of the headline with just that and of course, of course it's the Nuland thing. It always is because that's all there is and it's nothing. That's it. Nothing declassified supports the conclusion but they make it anyway. Zero journalism done, there's a reason this is only on substack and X.
"Well your Honor, we've got lot's of hearsay and conjecture, those are kinds of evidence.".
Yep, this is the first sale doctrine. If I buy it, I can do what I want with it.
Though readers can't buy from Kindle, only rent. But I assume the principle would still apply if it were ever tested.
So two of them snuck in by getting nominated? The other two were already around. What about Hegseth and Gabbard? They're not neocons too right?
What's the even the angle here?
Trump wants the war.
Trump is easily manipulated into the war.
Trump doesn't want the war but is a shit judge of character and/or is unable to stand up for himself.
Name names, who sneaked in and how did they do it?
Sure, she's not giving warning she's making a threat. It should be a empty one but look at the current administration she's shilling for.
How many free Flock cameras can we install to entice you?
Her time in the Senate felt more like a stunt to push her own brand and future prospects than any impetus towards public service. I'm not even speaking to the merits of the project, maybe the developers could return and make a better pitch to the town but putting her as the face I bet for at least a few people was instantly suspicious.
Curious though why her answer to the question of what's in it for the town is not quoted in the article, really keen to hear what her pitch to the mayor was (I assume it was tons of money and skirting around their concerns)
Aren't you glad you're not getting all the government you pay for now?