I don't think it's really about any of this. This smells to me like a pump and dump scheme. Get investors thinking this idea is hot shit because it's based on a well-established brand, and then make off with the money before anyone realizes the world didn't really need yet another microblogging service.
“Many users continue to refer to X as ‘Twitter’ and posts on X as ‘tweets,’ which demonstrates continued association and strengthens the case for residual goodwill,” [Alexandra Roberts, a professor of law and media at Northeastern University School of Law] says. She points to a 2020 case where a party attempted to register “Aunt Jemima” for breakfast foods, but was rejected “based on a likelihood of confusion” with Quaker Oats’ Aunt Jemima marks, even though the company had announced earlier that year that it was discontinuing the name and logo.
Beyond this, X has the resources to keep Operation Bluebird in court longer than Operation Bluebird can afford legal representation.
Attempts are made all the time but the success rate is quite low and fails shortly after.
What country do you live in and ill point out the people who are "forced" to keep society functioning and we can argue if we are "entitled" to it.
And another thing. Fuckin Benny Johnson, a private media figure, gets a death threat and then he appears at a press conference with fucking Attorney General of the United States
The fucking Vice President of the United States hosted Charlie Kirk's podcast for like weeks.
Unreal.
Well, not rally. The first printers were typewriters with cloth-ribbons and these were subject to the problems serifs address. I would say from around 24 needles onwards and typewriters with film-ribbons, serifs became inferior.
True, if we could have had 2020 Biden's brain in 1990's Biden body and energy you'd have like a super-president.
Are they a good guy/gal?
I agree, that's the saddest thing to me, is like if you want to disagree politics with Biden sure but through and through he was a decent person and it's quite sad we can't say that about the leader of our nation anymore.
Unfortunately while I wish it was true I think we're gonna have to do some edge-lord type shit to gain power back, the populace is just too cooked on 10 years of Trump style media. At very least they can't be anywhere as risk-averse as Harris was who while I give credit for doing what she could in 100 days just was just too complacent when the other side is whipped into a death-frenzy all the time.
Like I personally am not really in favor of Newsom being a leading contender for 2028 but I can't deny that I don't appreciate his shit-posting strategy now. Gotta strike a balance in there and tell these ghouls to get fucked... in a still appropriate fashing.
I think there but the argument in that debate over what is "liberal" news because if you ask a Republican they'll say just about everything as, and to some degree vice versa.
Really to me the biggest difference maker in how conservative media has been able to dominate is total media discipline. Only now are are we seeing some cracks forming but particularly in this past decade is that when Republicans, especially Trump make a statement or a narrative the entire media apparatus picks it up and runs with it, on message. From Fox to the cables to the podcast to the Youtubers, when Trump says a stupid thing and there is a talking point to defend it every single media channel will using that talking point.
It's an advantage Republicans think democrats have but really they don't, not to that degree. Again, Biden was excoriated day in day out by CNN, NBC, CBS, all the "liberal" news outlets were covering every slip up and ran negative stories just as often as positive ones. Jake Tapper wrote a fucking book about Biden's supposed senility.
Republicans can cram it about not having media at least on par with whatever they think liberals have. Again, this argument over the media is pretend, it is the talking point and we keep letting them get away with it.
But they already require Word. Silly to avoid an included font.
For several years, I had Comcast cable TV because it was $10 less per month to have Internet + TV than just Internet (and Comcast waived the cap if you had both, but enforced the cap if you had Internet only.)
This was several years ago. Now there are other providers that service my home, and it is cheaper to just have internet. (a LOT cheaper)
Agree there, he definitely should not have been trying to run for a 2nd term, I think it was the stress of trying to do both at once that really put a toll on him.
The only lesson AB learned is "the public is fickle and news cycles last only days or weeks" they haven't really lost anything long term.
And that's kindof the point, thinking a bunch of individual consumers can affect industries that are so large is kindof unrealistic, it's a massive collective action problem and the power asymmetry is wild. It's a fantasy that the world works this way.
No it doesn't it already fails on the first and most important point: it itself is not a democracy with a protected freedom of press. Fish in a barrel.
I came, I saw, I deleted all your files.
