That's too much future tech, but for now -- why not install a titanium plate? At least it won't cause rejection issues, and functionality wise is no worse than current transplants. And, instead of on-lookers getting revulsed, you'll get looks of awe. Severely disfigured wetware makes people say they offer compassion, but in reality they're severely disgusted and feel an urge to distance themselves from you -- because biologically, looking ill means something potentially transmissible, which our instincts try to protect us from. A visibly artificial face avoids all that.

Soo, how would they "subsidize everything"? I mean, where would the money come from? Materializes out of thin air?

Joke is on him. Steam allows refunds. And they get used.

And buy the slop before they know! Great business idea!

I guess this asshole does not know that Steam does refunds and often does refunds far beyond the "2h played" official limit. I have used it several times, never an issue.

But it still means some diversification in the more general landscape. It also means they can now, for a while, move again with lower effort.

While Google is probably not the best choice, the move also causes increased flexibility. They will now, for a while, be able to move again with relatively low effort.

That the move is difficult just shows how direly needed it is.

When all spaces are full, you can't park there anyway, independent of the question if there are 9 or 10 occupied spaces.

Driving from Dublin to Donegal means that you take a short cut through Northern Ireland. Crossing the border is an everyday occurrence. And that border is one of the main reasons why a) Northern Ireland voted against Brexit and b) the Brexit negotiations were so complicated, as it is easier to levy tariffs on the ferries between Northern Ireland and Great Britain than between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland.

and the ratio of cars to artics is a bit lower than that.

That is true, but it's also not uniform: some roads are 50% artics, and many others get almost none.

Unless the part of the penalty that doesn't compensate Indian consumers and businesses is the punitive damages to assure no repeats of the behavior.

They've been using AI based moderation for awhile now. Was actually a bit hilarious the time my partner ended up getting a brief "vacation" from Facebook because it misidentified a picture of a new Samsung phone as containing nudity.

your two strong hands, as you have in the past 40 years.

Let's break this down:

They chose the restaurant because of incorrect/misleading information on Disney's site. The site is subject to the same blanket TOS as most of Disney's online portals.

The restaurant made a terrible, deadly mistake. That was the crux of the issue, and trying to argue that they wouldn't have eaten there in the first place had Disney's website explained that the restaurant was not likely to accommodate their specific needs is the kind of logic only an ambulance chasing lawyer would use.

If you have life-threatening allergies, it is on you to make sure the restaurant can accommodate you. You can't have it both ways - if you know your allergies are serious and you know you're going to verify with the restaurant, you really can't claim that incorrect information on the website was truly at fault. If the restaurant swears up and down they can accommodate you and then fail to do so, you (or in this case, your next-of-kin) has a case against the restaurant itself - not its landlord.

Look, Disney gets things wrong often enough. If they had argued that Disney's TOS means you're SOL if an alligator kills your kid on Disney property, that'd be a whole different ballgame. But this was an independently owned restaurant that screwed up badly, and the lawyers saw the potential for Disney-sized dollar signs.

Another fucking idiot AC post.

I live in central Florida. There's gas stations and McDonald's on Disney's property. Those are absolutely independent entities - Disney just happens to be their landlord. If you rent an apartment, is the landlord responsible if you poison someone?

The law should apply fairly to a company regardless of their size or whether or not you happen to hold a favorable view of them.

Google says:
The Irish restaurant in Disney Springs, Raglan Road, is owned and operated by Irish partners John Cooke and Paul Nolan through their company, Great Irish Pubs Florida, Inc.. Although celebrity chef Kevin Dundon was a founding partner, he ended his partnership in 2017. Disney leases the property to Great Irish Pubs Florida.

The situation is similar to how a mall (remember those?) will lease out its space to various vendors. Malls have their own terms of use that it is implied you've agreed to once you've stepped through their doors. Here's an example.