Mostly ueseless, but not entirely so.
I was involved in a multi-year thread about a Pages issue. We collectively narrowed down the nature of the error, sent bug reports to Apple, and they actually fixed the bug (again, took like three years). So at least once it was helpful.
Still a thing:
I mean if freaking south carolina can vote blue, nearly every red senator is somewhat vulnerable.
So much this. Basic, simple laws that everyone can appreciate. Like no taking money from foreign states while in power.
citation needed
what is the problem with subsidizing a high capital business that is good for people?
I mean, this is an llmâ(TM)s great gift: salient summaries of huge swaths of text. Same as mlâ(TM)s digestion of humongus data sets.
The answer is simple: adverts in the ai reaults.
Except that science is theory. Like say, the theory of gravitation. Or germ theory.
spoken like a true vi user.
(wind and radioactive tumbleweeds)
(because, like, society has collapsed)
Yes. anything that will promote algorithm improvement would be awesome.
Is this really true? Maybe we havenâ(TM)t found a *complete* replacement, but we do have direct replacements in certain applications. Also, we have had many options to reconfigure demand but no political will. This last is definitely on âoeboth sidesâ and everyone. Nobody wants to change what they find comfortable or let go fairly rigid visions of material dreams.
It seems unlikely that wind is not represented on the graph because itâ(TM)s input value was zero. But sure, itâ(TM)s contribution varies, which variation can be planned for. Lots of cheap (technically) options. My favorite is use part of wind production to raise mass, then let gravity reclaim some of the energy.
Google canâ(TM)t do anything with clearing an overloaded inboxâ"one of the tasks for which it would be useful. By iverloaded i mean >5k emails. My friend is an email hoarder.
Measure twice, cut once.
