You didn't even read the article, did you?

That's the difference - in most countries the "mass produced swill" is fucking awesome. You don't have to go seek out a great beer in, say, Germany - wherever you stop for a drink will most likely have one. Try that in the US :)

Maybe, but it's not half a billion people, and they're not called "Muzzies". Those were the points I was referring to. And, to be honest, I doubt anyone wants to steal such a weapon, as it would be a pointless task. How are they going to use it? Crack it open for the sweet, sweet plutonium? Make the world's most obvious dirty bomb? It doesn't really make much sense.

You're more likely to get "flamed" because you don't know what "totalitarianism" means, yet seem to think beyond all doubt that you do. The rest of your abject nonsense is just laughable.

Google seems to simply encourage loads of different development directions, then figure out how to make money off them (if that is at all possible). Their goal isn't always ad space - that's not their only money-maker.

If they abide by international regulations regarding nuclear weapons and material, of course not. Let them have them.

Your logic doesn't really work. The nukes aren't driven from NY to LA.

You are a fucking idiot if you believe what you wrote. I sincerely hope that is not the case.

It's not even close to being actual terrorism. I'm all for hyperbole, but that's way off :)

He's already exposed loads. His methodology is perfectly sound.