Arm (it's not capitalized) chips with power comparable (not to mention better) than any PC mobile-class chip were absolutely new when they made the switch.
ARM (short for Acorn RISC Machine or Advanced RISC Machine) is an acronym, and all letters are capitalized. Arm is something attached to your torso.
Oh, totally. Your shitty Raspberry Pi is completely comparable to a device that performs 14x better than it.
I'm not saying Apple Silicon isn't better than the competition — it is — but that's not a fair comparison. Raspberry Pi's performance is largely because they use Broadcom chips, which stay several generations behind the state of the art. For example, the Raspberry Pi 5 (released in 2023) was designed around the Cortex A76 CPU (released in 2018).
Apple Silicon CPUs in a laptop put the power of a workstation-class laptop in the power envelope of a netbook.
Disagree. They put blazingly fast single-core performance and roughly half the speed of a workstation-class laptop in the power envelope of a netbook.
- M5 PassMark CPU Mark: (28561 multi / 6001 single)
- Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX top-end laptop chip (56007 multi / 4745 single)
- i9-14900KS top-end desktop chip (60511 multi / 4828 single)
They're nowhere near the top overall, but their single-core performance (which affects perceived speed more than multi-core performance, typically) is at the top.
To this day, you cannot find a comparison of a PC and a MacBook that doesn't sacrifice every shred of intellectual honesty the person has,.
You really can make the comparison. Which one is best depends on the workload.
You can have better performance, if you don't mind 2 hours of battery life, and you can have half as much battery life as the MacBook, if you don't mind the performance of a Nintendo Switch.
Yeah, that's about right. But Apple also uses those chips in desktop, where the comparison is not nearly as rosy.
Don't get me wrong, I love my M1 MacBook Pro. The battery life is spectacular, and performance is good enough. But I'd be lying if I said there weren't workflows for which Intel would be better. :-)