The FSM was invented to show what a farce the concept Intelligent Design is.

It's not a troll. It is intended to be a logical argument against ID.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/1498162/In-the-beginning-there-was-the-Flying-Spaghetti-Monster.html

Ok.

Now where can I sign up to buy my piece of government land to display my monument on? If you sell a piece to one religious group you can't deny selling pieces to other groups.

It seems to me that equal billing for Methodolgical Naturalists should be enabled as well. Since so many theists etc. argue that science is also a faith, then we should be allowed a monument.

Perhaps to Thales of Io.

So is this going to have a touch interface?

Syracuse. And it's called the Fortress of Ultimate Darkness.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6OKLgLZHFk

Or maybe they just got a warrant from a judge.

In fact if you were to read TFA it says:

"A federal magistrate in Denver approved sending surveillance software to Moâ(TM)s computer last year."

We need a new kind of razor for this....

Never attribute to extra-legal snooping by government agencies that which can be done with a simple legal warrant.

The rate of complications from exposure to the chicken pox virus is about 100 times higher than that with the vaccine.

Considering the recent quality and quantity of legislation from the legislature this seems our best hope.

That's pretty good. My father's was pretty short at 42 pages. The really cool thing is that he did the the whole PhD program in one year. It was an Ivy league school too. They didn't bother making him do a master's.

And in industry they do no research at all any more.

Over the last decade, measles vaccinations averted 10 million deaths â" one fifth of all deaths prevented by modern medicine worldwide.

Vaccine failures are nothing new, and are not increasing. For example there was a vaccine failure for measles in the late 1980s-early 1990s that led to 55000 cases of measles and 123 deaths.

http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/content/189/Supplement_1/S1.long

The fact is biochemistry is hard. Not everything always works the way you want. But the overall effect of these programs is so overwhelming positive we actually have nincompoops saying that these diseases were never a problem in the first place.

Well, there is a cognitive bias called recency. Clearly that's what's happening here.

Dr Shakil Afridi was completely corrupt long before the CIA found him.

The combination of this dirt bag plus a very ill-advised strategy by the CIA was a match made in hell.

http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-News-9-112572-Twists-in-the-Afridi-case

The entire thing is pit.

Anecdotal data is not evidence.

How do they know the code they've been given is the actual code used to generate the shipped binaries?

Can those Enterprise partners compile the code they've been given in order to compare the binaries with the binaries that MS ships?