Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:The basic question is answered...but still... (Score 2) 298

Or rather lets not have scientists challenging the current chicken-little population with real science that points out hypothesis contrary to current popular income models.

You can call it what you will but there is one truth;
So long as there is money to be made climate change will exist.

Comment Re:Celebrate booting gun forums/owners? (Score 1) 153

Why does everyone let the other Constitutional rights get shat upon, but act like that one damned thing is inviolate?

Why aren't all those people loudly braying about their 2nd amendment defending the other Constitutional rights?

Because the 2nd amendment is what will enable us to get those others back. There is a LOT of civil process still available before the braying you hear is gunfire.

I for one do not look forward to that. But the 2nd amendment remains as a legal means to enforce the will of the people as a *last resort*

Comment Re:Lost is a tricky word (Score 1) 310

Ok from a pedantic view then I agree, it would be exceedingly hard to rebuild the SaturnV. But that's the wrong question because building a SaturnV is only interesting from a historic perspective. The real question is have we lost the ability to build a high mass launch vehicle and the answer is definitely no.

The SaturnV had a 140,000KG mass to LEO capability. The Block-2 will have a comparable 130,000KG mass to LEO capability. Admittedly there's not one sitting on a launch pad right now but that's because there was never a need for it. Now that there's a perceived need we're building one. It's in the design and testing phase now but that's because they are in fact bloody complicated.

The whole 'we can't build a SaturnV' meme is interesting as a testament to the failings of compartmentalized design and poor record keeping but it's not evidence of some lost technical ability. We're not any dumber now than we were 50 years ago, or smarter for that matter. About all one can say is there's more headwind now from bureaucracy than there was 50 years ago but that's a process problem not a technical problem.

Comment Re:Lost is a tricky word (Score 1) 310

What do you mean by gone ? Once somebody has the bright idea of using round things to move other things the process of re-inventing the wheel is trivial. It's definitely frustrating to watch folks re-invent it but it take progressively less effort.

You make it sound as if they couldn't build the Saturn now if they had to, what you really mean is they can't simply start manufacturing it. The design concepts are not 'lost'.

Comment Really? That's All It Takes? (Score 1) 327

"Oh, sure! Suuuure! We'll stop trying to arrest you! Why don't you come out of that embassy there and... give it a try?" And for some reason I totally hear that in Brock Samson's voice.

And also, "You guys might want to think about, ah... febreezing that embassy of yours there... it smells like moldy pizza and... Assange crotch."

Comment Invalid comparison (Score 1) 220

The One Hoss Shay comparison would be valid if:

- Genetic engineers were madly trying to evolve a horse and still debating how many legs it should have.
- Mechanical engineers were still debating the optimal number of sides for a wheel. Somewhere between 3 and a lot.
- Structural engineers were still debating whether the frame should be made out of stone, iron, transparent aluminum or wood
- Behavior scientists were still debating what direction was best to drive the thing in and which orientation. Landscape or portrait driving mode

Obsolescence of parts is uninteresting when they have a half life significantly greater than their practical application.

Designing a One Hoss Shay in 1905 that would last a hundred years would be very useful for about 5 to 10 years. Then everybody will trade it in for a Model-T, 20 years later for a Model-A, after that figure 5 to 10 years as a function of economy.

Comment Re:FUD on top of FUD (Score 1) 699

It would not make it more secure. As the GP pointed out rm is just an example. Adding a user level hoop to jump through doesn't fundamentally change the nature of the problem. Root should be able to write to any filesystem exposed to it in read/write mode. The problem is it shouldn't have read/write access to that area . period . hard stop.

If you want a secure system then it's the data owners job to decide who does and doesn't have access, not to grant access to everyone and hope they do the right thing. In this case it's 100% UEFI's fault for exposing it's data in read/write mode.

Slashdot Top Deals

Nothing succeeds like the appearance of success. -- Christopher Lascl

Working...