Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:We already tried it (Score 1) 79

I was in the 2nd grade when that happened. From my perspective, it was a great novelty and meant we got to take (mostly unnecessary) flashlights to school that we used in the morning walking to our bus stop. It was a hit with the kids I knew. We were disappointed that the "experiment" was stopped.

Meanwhile, in the northern-most states, the kids go to school in the dark now part of the year.

Comment Re:Element Pro is not Open Source (Score 1) 55

A true FOSS solution may have encouraged wider adoption since there would be no licensing fees and things like serves costs could be handled by the EU on behalf of member states.

The basic solution is FOSS. An individual, a school or a business of any size can self-host the AGPL-licenced Elements server for free, and use their FOSS client from F-Droid. What they charge for is buzzword-features like "Corporate oversight", "Dynamic scaling". The "Sovereign" offer for governments is an airgapped deployment (internal communication of intelligence agencies)

Basically they're a service company around a FOSS solution.

Information taken from: https://element.io/en/pricing

Interesting. I wonder if the EU will role out an air-gapped version alongside a public version, much like the US'NIPR and SIPR nets. It would seem you need a publicly accessible version or else you are stuck with two solutions one public and one secure with the public one still a different product.

Comment Re:Element Pro is not Open Source (Score 1) 55

why not take an existing open source product, pour money into it to make it meet the EU requirements?

1) The Pro version isn't open source, but purchasing their proprietary offer also supports the AGPL version of their server 2) The EU wasn't going to develop anything internally, it's not what they do; they open a tender for the supply of services. They wrote the tender to somehow exclude Microsoft, maybe they wrote "must be based on an open protocol" (Elements is based on Matrix). Any company, whether local FOSS developers or large IT consulting companies could have proposed to do what you suggest, take a fully FOSS offer and take it to the needs of a government organisation. Maybe Elements won because they have an existing offer and not only promises.

It would be interesting to see the tender. A true FOSS solution may have encouraged wider adoption since there would be no licensing fees and things like serves costs could be handled by the EU on behalf of member states. It's not like getting rid of teams saves money as it I likely all part of the Office license terms and fees anyway.

Comment Re: Element Pro is not Open Source (Score 2) 55

Personal piggy bank? Isn't Trump the only president whose net worth actually decreased during the presidency? The decrease in wealth is unlike most modern presidents.

As for leaving the job with a lower net worth, Carter and Clinton were both in debt when they left; but of course rebounded with various books and speaking fees. Carter, IIRC, wrote over 30 books.

Comment Re:Element Pro is not Open Source (Score 2) 55

Element Pro is not Open Source. So the EU is swapping a shitty proprietary solution for another shitty proprietary solution. And what will they do when the company that developed Element Pro is bought by an American company ? Swap to another one ?! Stupidity and corruption is deeply ingrained in the European Commission.

Given they are no doubt spending significant money, why not take an existing open source product, pour money into it to make it meet the EU requirements? That would benefit the EU by having an open source alternative that would be widely available for adoption and if it is good enough to replace teams be a shot across MS' bow.

Comment Re: Element Pro is not Open Source (Score 2) 55

Personal piggy bank? Isn't Trump the only president whose net worth actually decreased during the presidency? The decrease in wealth is unlike most modern presidents.

While that is true for his first term, that was because of COVID and his heavy investments in real estate that were negatively impacted, much like all real estate, and estimates are his net worth rebounded and has doubled in his second term so it's not like he hasn't greatly profited form the presidency.

Comment Re:I can believe both things (Score 1) 80

This could work in conjunction with a future "just walk out" checkout implementation. You see a price at the shelf, pick up the item, you're presented with a bill in your email. You can't claim the price changed on the way to the register, and they know what price they showed you.

They could do that with their shopping app that lets you scan an item and checkout in app; but as soon as people found out they were charged different prices for the same thing on say the same day it would be a PR nightmare. I can see it more as a way to adjust prices dynamically regionally based on demand, not much different than what is done anyway just faster.

Comment Re:I can believe both things (Score 3, Insightful) 80

I'm not worried about the idea of personalized pricing. It just doesn't seem feasible. Implementation hurdles are abundant, the likelihood of complaints in-store is very high, and for not that much benefit.

I’m with you, how do they know what price to charge once you are at the checkout line? If you shop with someone and they track by phone, which phone to use at checkout? Both? What if one person doesn’t go to the line? It’s not as easy as change digital tag.

Slashdot Top Deals

The rate at which a disease spreads through a corn field is a precise measurement of the speed of blight.

Working...