80 trillion operations per second wasted on AI garbage when that could have gone to x86 emulation and made a smartphone on the level of desktop systems.
Instead they choose to spy on you and steal your information.
You stupid gamergate moron. This is why you can't get laid. You can't even remember the bitches you were white-knighting.
Which is way everyone gets rich, but a movie never makes money. Only a fool takes a cut of the gross Smart money gets a cut of the net.
Uhh.... no, you have it backwards. The gross money is the amount BEFORE the accounting shenanigans; the net is AFTER. A percentage of the net could be nothing after Hollywood accounting.
I recall Sir Alec Guinness getting about 2% of the gross for Star Wars. He made a LOT of money from that.
Yea, you are right, my bad. Should not drink and post...
It was legitimately a decent movie though. Not going to change the world or anything, but it was funny and well executed.
Good to know. I'll probably catch it when it comes out on streaming.
That is absolute and utter bullshit. It MIGHT be the case if DeepSeek had offices and/or facilities in the US. It does NOT. Merely offering services in the US doesn't get you anything.
I'm not sure United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez aapplies like you think it does. If that were teh case, any foreign corporation without a physical/substantial presence do not have to comply with US law even if tehy offer services in the US, or foreign banks comply with US reporting laws on US citizens.
United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez was about a search and seizure of a non-US citizen in a foreign country. Teh question is does offering services in the US via teh web and charging for tehm establish enough of a presence to be afforded Constitutional protection?
I ordered my anvil from Amazon.
sad it doesn't say ACME.
There must be an "ACME" stencil somewhere on Amazon?
Cheap Chinese copy
"there is no implied obligation to keep making it faster or more powerful"
That's why they don't allege slowing or lack of improvement as a cause of action, they allege collusion. Slowing or lack of improvement might be a overt act used to prove collusion, but is neither sufficient nor necessary to that proof.
And collusion is all so not illegal, as standards committees prove.
Go read what they actually wrote about their products and competition.
I have, and nothing in there or their T&Cs asserts they will always develop at some specific pace; their statements are very subjective and is the usual marketing puffery which is not some guarantee of anything and not grounds for a lawsuit. They talked about rapid scaling and increasing capabilities, but made no promises as to what that means in terms of how fast or what those capabilities will be, merely that it would get better and more powerful; and it still will, at a different pace. They talked about development speed as a competitive edge, but the market has shifted and they are responding. It is not reasonable to expect a company to develop products at some pace decided by outside persons based on some early product hype; and customers where getting specific product for their subscription and could always cancel if they don't like it. No one suffered a loss, and thus the lawsuit is bullshit.
If they would reprocess it, much of that 3.6 million pounds would become either valuable nuclear fuel or totally inert scrap.
The rest would only last 200-500 years before becoming totally inert.
Except for all of their public statements about ongoing development which completely destroy that argument, sure.
Slowing down development is still ongoing development, just a different pace.
These companies keep making public statements about how they are making it better and more powerful to benefit their customers, so yes it certainly does. Every public statement they make is relevant. That's how everything works, not just corporations.
However "better and more powerful" doesn't imply a pace of development. Slowing it done is not incompatible with "better and mire powerful."
1st Amendment grounds? What the fuck are you smoking? DeepSeek is a Chinese company. It doesn't get ANY of the protections of the US Constitution, you clown. It's a foreign entity.
DeepSeek offers services in the US and thus would come under the protection of teh 1st Amendment, teh same as any foreign company offering services in the US, the Constitution doesn't discriminate between US and non-US entities in teh US as far as their rights are concerned. A more tenuous argument, IMHO, would be such a ban violates he ight to freedom of association of those in the US.
Or that it's not getting better fast enough might be a better analogy. It's such a strange thing to feel entitled to, I can't think of anything that's getting better.
Welcome to an age where everyone is entitled...
Evolution is a million line computer program falling into place by accident.
