I suppose it depends on whether you want a comprehensive solution.

Switching to electric without also providing external ventilation doesn't solve the problem. Adding external ventilation to a gas range does, and still allows switching to electric in the future for even further gains.

In this sense "don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good" doesn't tell you which of the two imperfect solutions is better -- but I'm making the claim that the proper ordering from best to worst is electric + ventilation > gas + ventilation > electric + !ventilation > gas + !ventilation.

What I'm saying is that a minimal safe setup anyways requires an externally-ventilated hood regardless of the cooking fuel type.

Given that this is not mandated by building codes as it is, it's silly to mandate electric over gas. Neither of them are safe without external ventilation.

I love my induction too, but you need an externally-venting range hood anyway.

Take your cheap air quality detector and sear a steak on your induction without the fan on.

Scriveners guild opposes printing press

Weavers guild opposes powered loom

Farriers guild opposes automobile

Tellers guild opposes ATM

Water still wet

The $7500 tax credit implies a discount in the ballpark of 15% on a vehicle but expires at the end of the month. I'd expect that this is bringing forward a lot of sales that would happen for the rest of the year to take advantage before it goes away.

To be a real sense of the trend of sales, you'd have to average the before-tax-expiration and after-tax-expiration months to see what's up. Otherwise you're just measuring noise.

In the case of (2), the RAT would have deployed at the (hypothetical) point where both engine RPMs fell below the minimum required to power the critical electrical systems.

The RAT being deployed doesn't support or exclude fuel contamination as a root cause.

It walked me through replacing a starter on an old freezer step by step. I know a decent amount, but it was extremely helpful at connecting some of the dots and explaining some of the topics.

Unacceptable according to whom?

Part of the design of the web is that anyone can run any service which exchanges any data they wish. While everyone is entitled to share an opinion on those protocols, it's not up to anyone else to proclaim what is and is not acceptable.

Ultimately what individual hosts o the web do is up to them.

Are you accusing the BBC of advancing american-right-wing narratives?

I really hope that this ends up winnowing out the field of renewable energy sources to the true winners. We've had a great boom in the ideas, innovation and efforts, all great stuff, now it's time to call in the bills.

I'd like to see where they can stand on actually offering to power a giant datacenter or whatever with these alternate sources -- put up your best offers: X GW for $Y/MWH for Z years, contractually set. That's what the natural gas folks will do.

Is there?. Doesn't look great to me.

A human does not digest a huge dataset, produce random output, assess if that output is desired, tweak the parameters a little and repeat until the result is "good enough".

Honestly, this is exactly what my 2 year old does when speaking to adults. His "good enough" result is "adults can understand what I'm saying".

I cannot imagine how anyone that has even met a toddler wouldn't immediately identify that this is _precisely_ what they do.

Pretty sure (Wikipedia agrees) Alex Jones actually lost everything he owns in judgment.

I'm not cool with what we did at all, but it's quite false that he profited massively. He's bankrupt.

But they don't!

Most huge tech firms never use their patents offensively at all, even in cases where they are arguably infringed.

The big tech companies all hold a trove of patents to be used defensively. The idea is mutually assured destruction -- sue Microsoft for patent infringement and they can surely find something you do that's covered by one of theirs.

This is probably a good thing insofar as they have essentially disclaimed offensive use of them even against smaller competitors.