Hmm, I guess that tells us that :)

Wish that argument had been made already, sigh.

Is it?

I'd say it's some random journalist's conjecture about what investors are demanding.

Apple's share price is declining because of Trump's tariffs on China, where most Apple products are manufactured.

That's a much bigger problem for Apple than AI.

You certainly cannot, but it's unclear how you can get past the being attacked by people who are trying to kill you stage without doing some of it. I'd love a nonviolent solution, but not if it gets me killed in the process of making the attempt. I'm willing to risk death to some degree, because life is a risk, but most of us have limits.

Apple is listed on NASDAQ, not the NYSE.

Nothing I am about to say excuses Fox's obscene weaponization of attention, but this has always been true of all news media starting at least with bards, criers, and orators, and that's assuming that prior primates didn't have members of bands that fulfilled the same function. Sensationalism has always gotten eyes and ears and what news is or isn't reported, and how it has been reported, has always been a means of manipulating the masses.

Sub 10ms pings to bitchute and truth social!

No private corporation has ever sent men with guns to my house in the middle of the night to pound on my door.

My government has.

TFA doesn't say that.

There's no technical reason the identifiers need to be unchangeable.

The app could be designed to issue a different confirmation code for each transaction.

I'm not going to go over the entire list. That would take all damn day, and I owe you nothing.

For me, it's frankly sufficient to say that Trump is a racist, rapist, and pedophile, and Harris isn't.

For a slightly longer statement: Everything bad that Harris is, Trump is more of it. Authoritarian? He's a full on fascist. In favor of genocide? He wants the genocide done faster so he can build a hotel on top of it. A liar? Doesn't even bear inspection, he's one of the lyingest liars who ever lied.

You seem to think that comment was for you, when it was a reply to my own comment.

As I am generally inclined to be charitable to people not demonstrated to be fuckwits, I will assume that you are using Mobile and Slashdot hid this fact from you because they are shit at web design.

That's irrelevant to the legality of the people entering the country to apply for asylum, which is a right granted by a treaty we signed. This makes that act arguably illegal.

I don't see how Google reducing the number of Linux distributions they distribute is an antitrust problem.

They don't really need to unify anything. What they need to do is add a few bits and bobs to Android to make it provide a Chrome OS-like experience, and just throw ChromeOS away. Maybe they will find some use in some of the resources used around booting, or some drivers, but the latter thing is mostly already in Android.

Literally the only reason ChromeOS exists at all is that Chrome for Android wasn't very good at the time, and they needed an OS which could run the desktop version of Chrome. ChromeOS and Android have different device management systems, and Google has been putting their effort into the Android management software lately. Now that Chrome on Android is about as good as it is on the desktop, they can retire their redundant Linux distribution and its management tools and save themselves a lot of duplicated effort.

Every time you mod me down I just post more to get more karma, and it works, so my karma stays at or near the kap.

100% agree.

I believe that in Slashdot's current moderation system (with scores capped to five, and the content of comments being outright unavailable on mobile if the scores fall too low) moderators' identities (that is, their made-up slashdot ones, not their actual identities) should be public. You should be able to see who is responsible for which mods.

This is not as good as a proper web-of-trust system where e.g. your chosen Slashdot poster relationships would affect how moderation was applied to comments, which IMO would also make it unnecessary to see who modded what and how. But at least it would let you make informed decisions. Sure you can adjust comment scores based on those relationships, but you cannot affect the effects of moderation that way, and that's what's really wanted to make moderation effective and useful — The only way in which I care what my foes or freaks think about a comment is that if they think it's bad, I want to read it — which is the opposite of what Slashdot moderation does.