Or Jane/Lonny Eachus is the world's most blatant hypocrite. And since you're shamelessly bragging about being a good liar...
No, since you insist on bringing this up, let's revisit this. Because you will, just as hilariously as before, lose this one too.
You have often claimed I have been "pretending to be" a woman, mainly because I made a comment long ago that "most people who bothered to look" called me a gal. I let your snide comments slide for a long time, because I believe in giving people "enough rope".
When finally I felt it was no longer funny watching you thrash about lost in your own inanity, I deigned to explain that comment:
Yes, most people who bothered to look at the name "Jane Q. Public" have referred to me here on Slashdot as a gal. Why do you have such a problem with that?
You see, MOST people here on Slashdot ASSUME I am a "he"... and never even look at the handle to which they are replying. Which I find funny as hell, in a rather sad way. But those who DO bother to look -- the rarer cases -- are usually willing to accept it.
I have been planning on writing something about that.
You, however, look at ONLY the handle ("well, not 'only'...") and have been raising a stink about it for years now. It's a fucking pseudonym, twerp. Live with it.
Jane, you're shamelessly bragging about being a good liar.
What evidence do you have that my explanation is a lie? You already know the answer, so I'll tell everybody else: zero.
One of these days -- and there is even the possibility it will be in court -- I will tell you why I chose to use the pseudonym "Jane Q. Public". And when I do, there is a very good chance you will look pretty foolish. I am deliberately understating.
I believe in taking a long-term view of things. And lots and lots of rope.