Nothing we can do? I agree if someone is willing to die, it is difficult to stop them in all cases. But maybe we can make potentially crash inducing actions in the cockpit of a plane (like shutting off fuel to engines) something that requires input from two pilots.
There are plenty of "potentially crash inducing actions " that a pilot can do, forcing two to do them also means in an emergency you are complicating the response nad keeping one from flying the plane while the other coordinates the emergency response.
The opposing force is they are looking down the barrel of a demographic implosion that has already begun. Their labor force started shrinking in 2015.
Good point. It will be interesting to see how the aging workforce, lower birth rates and changes in the labor market play out.
"Dumb company runs its finances on 20-million-cell spreadsheets" is my takeaway from that.
You just called every company dumb. Either that or you just pointed out you have no idea how financial departments work. Massive excel spreadsheets are the mainstay of all large companies and even wall street. In many cases replacing a spreadsheet will require a myriad of interlinked tools, databases, calculation engines, scripts, all suddenly opaque to the end user who ultimately needs a data in a row that is able to be analysed. Most of the best data analytics tools are also designed around the ability to quickly ingest large spreadsheets and export them again.
I'd add they likely have been vetted and mistakes corrected (though some may still exist) and have proven to be good tools. Trying to convert that would introduce new mistakes, you'd likely lose data, etc. As long as it works don't try to make it 'better' because better may not be better.
Some people are just used to working in this way. The old timers.
But there's also the fact that the numbers in the spreadsheet are just half of the story. Those people need the ability to tweak those numbers and instantly recalculate tens/hundreds of other things.
Using a database would require a very extensive and always-changing frontend which would be an enormous expense.
Good points. I'd add time consuming as well because now you have to go to the developer to make changes rather than doing them yourself. A simple quick what if? that takes a few minutes to do now could take days as you get into the development que; costing more time and money than its worth.
I think some EU laws also fine companies based on their global revenue - for GDPR complaints, for example - so there is legal precedent and I'm not sure how it could be unconstitutional. Multinational companies evade laws and tax by playing around countries one against another, so I would say it's fair game to hit them globally instead of just aiming at the subsidiary acting in the country where misbehavior occurs.
Many of those same countries willing offer incentives to get companies to locate operations there; it's not like they are innocent victims. Actions like India's will lead to counter actions to retaliate for such fines, resulting ultimately in both sides being hurt or one backing down.
That's however not at all related to what we are building these days and there's little to no walking around or checking anything. A large portion of modern process design is reducing the need to read anything. Sensors are cheap. Data recording is cheap. Everything is digital. For a project it now costs almost as little to install a wireless pressure gauge than it does a physical one (same for every other process measurement). For a greenfield construction the cost of wiring is borderline irrelevant too so even wired equipment costs little more.
Certainly sensor technology has improved with modern designs, but the notion you can rely on sensors alone is wrong, and dangerous, IMHO. Sensor fail, power is lost, etc.; all of which will require an operator to check. Even with advanced sensor technology, there are things that indicate problems that sensors will not pick up. Even something as a valve failing to operate, developing a packing leak, or its position indicator giving a false reading will need an operator to check. If you 'bury' the reactor and have to shut it down to check on something to verify sensor readings, you may find the costs to operate way higher than you expected. As much as I think nuclear has a key role to play, the idea that a plant can simply be 'buried' and operated fully remotely seems to be more a dream than a reality.
Well false, and covered.
Firstly no, nuclear plants do not require daily maintenance. In fact the core / steam loops are largely maintenance free outside of planned shutdowns years in advance. Maintenance is usually only carried out every 24 months.
They actually do require frequent routine maintenance, from dealing with everything from packing leaks, checking unusual equipment readings, etc. There is a reason someone is walking around secondary and taking readings and checking equipment. Having to shut it down every time would really impact its output.
Companies would normally be terrified to fire this many engineers because they'd be snapped up by competitors.
I wonder how many of them were really engineers, and not just some random coder with engineer in the title.
How did they possibly lose this case? This could easily destroy Disney's bottom line because people will purchase sling for 1 day for only for sports events instead of a monthly subscription.
Per TFA:
Disney argued that the passes violate an agreement with Sling TV that says the service must give subscribers access to its content through monthly subscriptions.
However, Judge Subramanian argues that this claim isn’t likely to succeed, as the contract doesn’t stipulate a “minimum subscription length,” adding that the agreement’s “broad definition” of a subscriber “clearly covers users of the Passes.”
Seems Disney never though a streaming service would offer anything less than monthly subscriptions and thus did not did not clearly define a minimum subscription length; and thus Sling could sell one day subscriptions. IIRC, if a contract is not clear the benefit goes to the one who did not write the contract, in most cases. I suspect Disney will fix this in the next contract, or look to see if generates marginal revenue without hurting subscription revenue and decide it's OK. Sling also probably would not have offered it if they though it would have a negative long term impact on subscriptions and subscriber growth.,
Neither the summary nor the article bother to mention this.
I suspect people will realize that it is US sales numbers when they read 'federal tax credit" and amounts in $, as well as Rivian. As to cause, I suspect those on th fence pulled the plug before credits expired, and others just saw a huge price increase. Paradoxically, if you want an EV in the US now is likely the time to see what sort of deal you can get as dealers want to get rid of them and stop paying for the floor plan.
With so many examples out there like Radio Shack, the first thing I always wonder is . . . does it actually have anything to do with Creative Labs?
It appears so since the Creative Labs page advertises the Kickstarter campaign. In addition, they use the Creative SoundBlaster logo and I suspect CL's lawyers would be on them if they weren't associated with CL in some way.
You have a message from the operator.