And have the bus pointer the wrong way? I think worse, now you have a bus full of kids structured for a head on crash with oncoming traffic.
I doubt any bus driver would want to cross to the other side, it would be a challenge, even if cars cooperated. You'd have a line of blocked cars that would need to be let by, while holding up traffic behind you. If the driver doesn't have on red flashers when they start to move, a car could potentially legally pass them and the bus pull out into them. Then if the stop is near a corner, the driver may not see an oncoming car, setting up your scenario; or I've seen stops on a street with a 45 MPH limit, trying to cross that and then face oncoming traffic would be crazy.
I can see how this system evolved in an US specific environment, but I wonder if it wouldn't have been safer to design schoolbusses with exits on both sides and just let the kids out on the right side of the road? For proper bus stops you can just put a zebra crossing sufficiently behind the stop to make it safe.
In general, bus stops are designed for the students to exit on the non-street side. The issue is kids who have to cross the street to get home since a stop serves multiple homes on both sides of a street. Retracing the route would double the bus transit time for some kids, who likely just get off the bus at the first stop and not theirs if the bus retraced the route so they could get off on their side of the street.
Why should drugs be illegal in the first place?
Are you saying that Republicans who fight disclosure of donor lists to their pet causes are funding illegal activities?
They're politicians, so adding in funding illegal activities is redundant.
Given that most Bitcoin investors are just speculative hobbyists, a mixing service is a fun toy! Kind of like when all the open source nerds signed their emails with public keys so strong encrypted email was a fun hobby and totally not a way for organized criminals to communicate.
I suspect most of those speculative hobbyists aren't simply giving up a percentage of their holdings to use a fun toy; if you're speculating why give up a % of your return when you get no value from it? As for PGP and its ilk, there are probably a lot more legitimate users, which is why law enforcement used other means, such a taking over services clandestinely to be able to track organized crime; just like wiretaps allowed targeting suspected criminals without eliminating telephones. That's not to say governments aren't trying to get backdoors, and while I disagree with that approach, it's still allows targeting suspects without eliminating encryption. Of course, you have to rely on governments to play fair, something "for the children" arguments make the effort suspect and open to fishing expeditions.
Personally, I think taking it over surreptitiously would be a better move because then you can see and track both ends of the transaction; something they may have done but wouldn't admit to until they have some strong cases. They may have done that and after they had what they needed decided to shut it down. Who knows, I certainly don't.
Can you think of legal uses where you deposit untainted crypto just because you want privacy? Should that be shut down because it's also used for money laundering? Are you attacking a symptom that has multiple causes, as if only one of the causes matters and screw the rest of the perfectly legal uses?
I suspect it's about the ratio of illegal users to legitimate ones that made it a target. Assume the Swiss and Germans were able o track the incoming sources they could identify patterns of suspect transaction and thus decided to shut it down.
This just opened my eyes to just how overeducated a numbskull these people have to be to be so easily replacable by AI.
And they earn THAT much pre graduation?
America sure is a weird and silly place.
A lot depends on what they do; many of the Big 4 undergrad hires go into Oracle, PeopleSoft, etc. jobs, coding, detailing as built, writing specs, etc.; some of which can be turned over to AI, especially as it gets better. Once you get to the MBB (McK, Bain, BCG) MBA hires it's a lot less that and a lot more problem analysis; some of which can also be done by AI. AI could certainly create a deck using McK's or other firms template, that eliminating a more junior staffer and letting a more senior one edit the draft.Given turnover rates of 25%+ in both areas, it doesn't take long to downsize a firm at the bottom by not hiring and letting attrition run its course, it's the partners who depend on the revenue to make serious money that will be on the chopping block next.
Once inside, the hackers used the truckers' accounts to bid on real shipments,
So the hackers enter bids in the name of real truckers. Don't these truckers "close the loop" on the paperwork? They didn't bid on that load, so why are they picking it up?
As I understand it, it's at the broker level the theft occurs. Company A hires logistics company B to deliver goods, who then arranges for the load to be picked up by a trucking firm. Some of that may get offloaded to another trucking broker, who is fake and takes the load, hires a legitimate trucker who they give a different delivery address, and the load disappears. The trucker has no idea the load is being stolen, the driver is just doing a delivery like they always do.
The DIY bariatric bypass kit
Yellowcake uranium where one person complained it was only half as much as advertised
Too bad amazon killed them...
Nothing we can do? I agree if someone is willing to die, it is difficult to stop them in all cases. But maybe we can make potentially crash inducing actions in the cockpit of a plane (like shutting off fuel to engines) something that requires input from two pilots.
There are plenty of "potentially crash inducing actions " that a pilot can do, forcing two to do them also means in an emergency you are complicating the response nad keeping one from flying the plane while the other coordinates the emergency response.
The opposing force is they are looking down the barrel of a demographic implosion that has already begun. Their labor force started shrinking in 2015.
Good point. It will be interesting to see how the aging workforce, lower birth rates and changes in the labor market play out.
"Dumb company runs its finances on 20-million-cell spreadsheets" is my takeaway from that.
You just called every company dumb. Either that or you just pointed out you have no idea how financial departments work. Massive excel spreadsheets are the mainstay of all large companies and even wall street. In many cases replacing a spreadsheet will require a myriad of interlinked tools, databases, calculation engines, scripts, all suddenly opaque to the end user who ultimately needs a data in a row that is able to be analysed. Most of the best data analytics tools are also designed around the ability to quickly ingest large spreadsheets and export them again.
I'd add they likely have been vetted and mistakes corrected (though some may still exist) and have proven to be good tools. Trying to convert that would introduce new mistakes, you'd likely lose data, etc. As long as it works don't try to make it 'better' because better may not be better.
A hacker does for love what others would not do for money.