CLEP is something that should be at the top of the discussion. Get many of your gen ed requriements out of the way for $80 a class.
also has a ton of hints.
multiple 4k streams?
and have 2 rate increases on internet services in the same year with no additional speed increase.
Americans get uppity about mistresses as it means the politician is compromised in some way. The politician could be blackmailed over it. The politician is not trustworthy. It implies that they are corruptible and have lied and makes us wonder what else they have lied about.
In our military, extra martial affairs are illegal for these very reasons.
Blend in with the local populace.
Sailors can have beards at sea.
Anyone check the IDS?
Applicant has a duty to disclose (See MPEP 2001) any and all prior art that they are aware of at the time of filing.
Per MPEP 2001.01
(c) Individuals associated with the filing or prosecution of a patent application within the meaning of this section are:
(1) Each inventor named in the application;
(2) Each attorney or agent who prepares or prosecutes the application; and
(3) Every other person who is substantively involved in the preparation or prosecution of the application and who is associated with the inventor, with the assignee or with anyone to whom there is an obligation to assign the application.
Individuals having a duty of disclosure are limited to those who are “substantively involved in the preparation or prosecution of the application.” This is intended to make clear that the duty does not extend to typists, clerks, and similar personnel who assist with an application.
Some people aren't really familiar with slip angles or trail braking either and the role of weight transfer in terms of taking a corner. Most people on this discussion probably have zero HPDE experience let alone seat time at a local autox/rallyx.
Duty to disclose is only for art that applicant is aware of or believes is reasonably pertanant to the current application. This is why you see information disclosure statements which may have references cited in other pending cases, but may have nothing to do with the current claimset.
If applicant searches and finds new art then they should disclose it in a later IDS. Strangely applicants do cite prior art which reads on their claims and may be found by a foreign office, but do not ammend the claims to get around the prior art until a US examiner writes a rejection. This seems counter to the various compact prosection practices that the office and AIPLA advocate and may cost applicant more money.
wait, you read d knows all and whiskey's place too?
Juror b-29 was described as black/hispanic.
You could make an ak47 pretty easily. Just need some sheet metal for the reciever, a jig and a drill press.
Making the barrel would be a bit more challenging if you don't have the right tools, but you really only need a machine shop to build pretty much any firearm.
The office gets money for almost every thing the applicant files. They also make additional money off renewals for allowances.
Strangely not every fee covers the costs of examination.
The patent office has been hiring 1,000-1,500+ examiners a year for the past few years. While an increased allowance rate is one factor, when the Office has trippled in size since 2001, its hard to ignore the effects of more examiners.
I've been to china a number of times, and customs and immigration as well as their version of the TSA are all wonderful. Same in Japan too.