Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?
Slashdot Deals: Cyber Monday Sale Extended! Courses ranging from coding to project management - all eLearning deals 20% off with coupon code "CYBERMONDAY20". ×

Comment Re:Liberals (Score 1) 585

Liberals are all about freedom, expression, tolerance, etc. until you do or say something that they don't like.

And conservatives are all about small government until it's time to tell someone how to live their life.

The left/right bullshit is designed to take your eye off the ball. This is about control versus freedom.

Comment Re:Wasn't one of the other concerns (Score 2) 151

Like the AC pointed out . . . poorly . . . "diesel gas" is a bad term. Diesel and gasoline are two different fuels, and the terms are mutually exclusive.

That said, I agree with you about safety, even more so. Diesel is significantly safer to store than gasoline. It is significantly less volatile, and while the fumes from it can ignite, it is really difficult to get them to do so accidentally. Except in the presence of fertilizer, diesel is generally not explosive. While you can light a puddle of gasoline with a match easily and accidentally, you will need to take significant effort to light a puddle of diesel.

Obviously, a leak is still a potential problem, but the first concerns most people have are not going to be issues.

Comment Re:Most places that would be illegal (Score 1) 602

Why the excuse? "No!" should be sufficient. As I do not work for that company anymore, that isn't unreasonable.

I suspect that it is necessary to sign the agreement if you want to collect your severance package. Want to leave three months pay on the table?

That said, I would consider a duress defense.

Comment Re:A perfect example of why tech is cyclical.... (Score 1) 94

Was there ever a time this wasn't true?

Maybe five to ten years ago or so. I think that bandwidth shot up around then, which left us with a brief respite before people started demanding more data with the more bandwidth that they then had. At least, that's the way it seems to me. I was pretty happy with my bandwidth around then. I know that bandwidth has gone up since then, but that the demand for content has gone up more.

That's just my perception, though. YMMV.

At the same time, it seems like some things don't move or don't move much. Video seems to have settled in at around 4-8 Mbit/sec, which even works on some of the lower tiers of Internet service.

That, however, naturally leads me to the next point: Most Internet access isn't symmetrical, and hasn't been since 33.6k modems. I bought the particular level of service I have because I mix audio and video as a side-gig, and I need the outbound bandwidth. This solution from Amazon provides just exactly that, just the latency is kind of high.

Comment Re:How do you define "malicious"? (Score 1) 165

How do you define the word "malicious"?

I think you have to be setting out to cause harm in order for it to count as malicious. As such, I would concede that GNOME made a mistake, but I would think it hyperbolic to say that they that GNOME 3 is malicious.

I think if you want to call something malicious, you have to have set out in the first case with intentions to subvert the user's sovereignty over their own property. Install something I didn't ask for and would have specifically rejected? Malicious. Make it difficult to opt out? Malicious. Report my local drive searches that are none of your business? Malicious. Lock me out of content I bought? Malicious. Bloat my phone with a bunch of apps I can't install? Malicious. Make a dumb-ass design mistake? Dumb-assed, but not malicious.

To conflate bad design with malice dilutes the discussion of things that genuinely are malicious -- that genuinely mean us harm.

Comment Re:The frog is boiling (Score 2) 217

I have two thoughts about this:

First, I find it worrisome, but not as much as when it impacts the non-game software world, i.e. the world of operating systems and productivity software, stuff that either is something everyone uses, or people use to make money, or both. What do you do if your job depends on your computer booting, which it refuses to do?

Second, I don't know if you have noticed or not, but some software companies (Microsoft, for instance) don't even try to hide the fact that there is nothing in the box, because .; . . there is no box. If you buy software from a bricks-and-mortar these days, you often just get a card with a nonce printed on it under a scratch-off spot. You scratch off the spot, go to a specified website, enter the nonce, and your software downloads.

Comment Re:This doesn't seem unusual. (Score 1) 152

(usually only PR or execs can do it)

Truth. Interestingly enough, this makes it very easy to tell the official story from the unofficial, when there has been an incident of some sort. All you have to do to filter (or filter out) the official story is grep for a pattern like /tak(ing|es) .* seriously/. Try it! It works surprisingly well.

Anything cut to length will be too short.