Oh indeed it is shaming language, one of the few two bit tricks that lackbrained and heavily indoctrinated meat puppet social justice warriors use to try and win arguments. It usually comes accompanied by critical theory attacks, which are not to be confused with critical thought, indeed they are the exact opposite of critical thought.
So, let's "deconstruct" this as you chimanpzees are wont to say.
A real man has a cock and two nuts. That's all it takes to be a real man. Nobody cares what you think a real man is. Nobody.
This site isn't and never has been a place where women are generally considered inferior. Only a dribbling zealot incapable of reading and comprehending the words before them could possibly believe that to be the case. Said zealot then falls back on social justice parlour trick number three: hyperbole the shit out of everything. Someone has an objection to gender based quotas, they're obviously wifebeating rapists. Someone points out that the "pay gap" is based on age and experience instead of gender, they're clearly whiney little boys who need to grow up.
Here's my advice, take two steps back and get fucked, you tantrum throwing little poster child for the wee man syndrome.
If you actually cared about your "daughters, nieces etc" you wouldn't be parroting feminist talking points like an idiot, you'd be teaching them to take responsibility for themselves and to succeed on their own merits. If you weren't so busy seeing muh soggy knees and rapists everywhere, you'd recognise that teaching women to be paranoid neurotics is doing them less of a favour than the Salem witch trials did for the moral fibre of the locality.
There's really not much to it.