If your small turbine-dynamo in the air intake was even an epsilon-small option for charging your electrical vehicle, it would instantly become a viable solution to power the entire universe

No, this is a french attack, we have to wave in your general direction...

you're holding it wrong

try holding it higher

try holding it higher

dogs are consumed as food pretty much everywhere

in china, they just don't have to pretend they serve something else

in china, they just don't have to pretend they serve something else

I just love how your sig and your "touring test" combine

The proof as laid out is correct for an arbitrary N. The induction step is to show that it is also true for N+1

Appart for the major woosh, as you didn't get the obvious joke "this holds for any N" -> "no !!! only for N-2" (and I'm not sure at this point that you will even get the hint)

You seem to have a major problem understanding the induction process which you claim to be your prefered and most intuitive way of understanding mathematical proofs. (but since you're a nice person you still admit that your GP's post is good enough for slashdot standards (thank you very much for him/her and the rest of us))

So "The proof as laid out is correct for an arbitrary N" as you said...
Why in the world would you need to show that it is also true for N+1 ? N+1 ***is*** an arbitrary N

Induction is about having specific working examples (not arbitrary !!!) and proving that from here the next candidates must also be valid.

Also, induction is not just about having N and proving N+1, or I could 'prove' you many funny things (sometimes you need more than just one element to get the next and depend on several ones (P(0) and P(1) are true, thus P(2) (depending on the previous two) is true)

So there we were, following a nice, civilized, interesting conversation about "alot" vs "a lot", "dumbass" vs "dumb ass", "incorrectly" vs "wrongly", "your" vs "you're", black vs white, good vs evil, ...

I made some popcorn (vs pop corn), I come back, and you completely ruin it by talking about the Xbox One (vs XBone)

Shame on you...

I made some popcorn (vs pop corn), I come back, and you completely ruin it by talking about the Xbox One (vs XBone)

Shame on you...

:D excellent :D (too bad its ruined by it's ;))

This is exactly what I'm doing :)

Yep, same here

I "noscript block" anything coming from google, block cookies, and only allow them when someone finally calls me to say "hey I sent you an email why don't you answer ?"

I temporarily then accept the cookies, check the mail, block and clean again

I unfortunately have many mails there, but more than that, it's the way I'm supposed to be reached for important notifications, or, say, recover a lost password (from slashdot among others)

So it will take some time, but, I'll be closing this account with great satisfaction soon enough

I "noscript block" anything coming from google, block cookies, and only allow them when someone finally calls me to say "hey I sent you an email why don't you answer ?"

I temporarily then accept the cookies, check the mail, block and clean again

I unfortunately have many mails there, but more than that, it's the way I'm supposed to be reached for important notifications, or, say, recover a lost password (from slashdot among others)

So it will take some time, but, I'll be closing this account with great satisfaction soon enough

Are you talking about electrically charged egyptians ?

Kids these days get on the net earlier and earlier... it's getting scary

<0)

. ( \

8=x=D

<0)

. ( \

8=x=D

I see all this interest for this product and I think my next Idea will blow this one out of the water

**5** seconds toothbrush !!!

No, but this is one:

<body>I'm not here<body/>

- experience -

<body>I'm not here<body/>

- experience -

Keep the number of passes in a compiler to a minimum. -- D. Gries