And the moron-fraction makes its expected appearance....
Yes. But if will be them getting shot at, and, you know, that have training and equipment you do _not_ have.
They were lucky...
The single, most stupid fantasy used to promote guns. First, it is unlikely to happen, ever. Second, if it does you run and call the police.
Shit the government better fits you "aggregation of money" description better than big companies do. Hell it even prints its own money. Your use of the term capital gives away your commie sympathies.
So companies aren't people, but ginormous government is your mommy. Got it.
They stand to lose tens of millions unless they're smart about how they do a private release now.
They will release straight to DVD, and they will make a killing. Wait, that came out wrong
You can't take down a full movie theatre with one suicide bomber, you would need several (at least one for each screen, somehow synchronized to maximize damage).
So you attend several ahead of time and plant bombs while you're there, there's loads of places in the average theater where you could hide an explosive. Then you set them off by cellphone. It's not rocket surgery. That nobody has done this already proves just how few terrists there actually are active on merican soil.
You got it wrong. Getting elected is how to get the American media to control you.
You all got it wrong. Controlling the American media is how you get elected.
You're missing the point. They didn't choose not to show the movie because of a terrorist threat. They chose not to show the movie because it would cost them money. Regardless of what they say, they are not taking the threat seriously.
They are acting like they are, so the damage is done. They have promoted kowtowing to terrorists.
What they are taking seriously is the number of customers who would choose not to come see The Interview
That sounds to me like taking it seriously.
I made it 2/3rds deep before I realized I was wasting my life
And that you could have just read TINAG.
I read quickly, because I'm good at it, so I enjoyed Reamde. But if you're slow, you might need to try another author.
So much for the 'information superhighway'.
Wow, you just invalidated your entire comment. Thanks!
Fire up wireshark, sort by DNS and pick any well known website at random. why are there all these queries for dozens of others sites?
Because you're not running ghostery. HTH, HAND.
Encryption has a cost, it isn't free.
Thermodynamics, how does it work!@!@@#!!
It increases CPU utilisation and power consumption.
Negligibly for the user; only slightly for the server end if specialized hardware is used.
It interferes with caching
Only at the proxy level.
and reduces network efficiency.
...and only if you're using proxy caching.
This is a dumb idea. A very dumb idea.
It's still smarter than making it easy to intercept your communications.
You say dumb, but some of us have been calling for end-to-end encryption of all communications since forever. If we have a right to privacy, then we should protect it by default. To me, dumb is enabling a surveillance state by not using encryption. In fact, I call that evil.
These clothes will be easy to steal, because you can just wrap them up in a wad and they will block their own theft tag. And once you've stolen them, you can use them to steal other items, because they will block theft tags. Sounds awesome for theives and like total wankery for everyone else.