He's what Texas thinks a smart person looks like.

That makes no fucking sense. Companies at the top got there because lots of other companies are their customers.

Amazon may be influential in the realm of cloud services for example, but we are their customer and I don't owe my job to them, I owe it to OUR customers, because that's where the money comes from.

Your idea, that my customer can't tell Amazon what to do inverts the whole fucking power structure, that's batshit. Also the premise that Amazon would cease to function without Bezos and his personal wealth being what it is, that is doubled-down on batshit insanity. There are lots of valid reasons personal wealth distribution shouldn't be so fucking disparate that don't have fuck-all to do with the environment, and all of your personal choices affect the economy and environment. Tax Bezos, regulate Amazon, educate yourself.

How did it work out, let me get you straight. When Trump announces a ridiculous new punitive tax like 100% on inbound moose nuts, then TACOs a week later you say it was a brilliant negotiation strategy because the real 4d chess goal was to gain things like .... uh, IDK, this? Which is a net gain because no math allowed we say so.

Then when another country announces a dumbass punitive tax and later drops it, you say haha, got'em. Like you can't see they did the same thing back to you to show how dumb it is and everyone can do it. This is why we think Trumpism is a cult.

That's bullshit, an LLM can mimic how humans write very well, but they can't manipulate you. They entirely lack a model of a human mind. They're not capable of modeling your state of mind to infer why you said what you did or to reason about cause and effect of what can be said to influence your mental state.

You can mistake its mimicry for intelligence if you don't really think very hard... look, the thing is some people are one step away from joining a cult. They are looking for someone to think for them. We do need to look out for them and chatbots should be written responsibly to protect people from themselves, but an LLM is no more a risk of manipulating you than a book is. Some books need guardrails too, they need an appropriate amount of context presented alongside them to protect vulnerable people. I guess we could say books are manipulative, but we all know this entirely depends on the reader being easily influenced, same with chatbots.

GS only goes to 15. If you count one of your hands twice you don't have to take a sock off.

You accuse others of not listening to people affected by the problem, and here's the governor of Ohio telling you your problems are made up and exactly what the real problems are which are basic needs for any population boom - more funding for schools, law enforcement, etc.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/0...

Time and time again, this is what the Republican Party represents. It does not listen to Republican governors on refugee settlement issues. It does not listen to Republican mayors on border issues. It does not listen to Republican women on women's issues. The finger is always pointed somewhere else. You "make things up to bring people's attention to the real problem" - JD Vance, but accuse others of not listening. This is why nobody takes you seriously, notably your own constituents who are happy to vote for made up things but aren't really that stupid to believe it, and you'll always be fighting that internal inconsistency. Good luck, moron.

Nobody has ever won a fight by announcing how many pull-ups they can do.

You're both-siding "residents of X are doing Y" with "someone somewhere did Y sometime"

Saying nobody is fucking goats in Boston is not partisan rhetoric ignoring the fact that somewhere a goat has in fact been fucked.
Those are not two "halves" of the truth unless you're fucking a goat in Boston. ARE YOU, RobinH? How do I know, because if I have to make stuff up to bring the media's attention to this goat fucking problem, I learned that skill from a highly regarded, Yale educated hillbilly that certainly knows a thing or two about goat fucks.

It's like any other strength, having it and applying it are totally different things. Nobody uses all of their potential all of the time. It comes down to willpower and training. Like being able to paint well but never finishing a painting, being strong and not knowing how to fight or lacking endurance, being smart and buying crypto.. IQ tests are like pull-up competitions, it'll help you find strong people, not people that don't suck at everything.

If that were true you'd see it in at least some other species, and you don't.

Our survival didn't depend on beating the environment or our development would have stopped a long time ago. You don't need what we have to do that, look around at everything else that does it.

The only thing that makes sense is we were competing with ourselves, or a more intelligent predator, which doesn't exist. Like a shit ton of humans were living together and had fuck-all else to worry about but outwitting each other to survive. I can't think of any other way to evolutionarily force runaway intelligence gain. It had to have happened where food was abundant and there were a lot of people. Or precursors to people, whatever.

The whole parent project is at the intersection of cloudy devops and Linux desktop woo woo

Dude are you a flat earther or something?

Rinsing soap off is a physics problem not chemistry. Taking aerators off your faucets wouldn't help you wash more efficiently either for example, try it. Try doing dishes like that with the sink stopped up, no aerator vs the sprayer. The volume of water doesn't get shit done. Most people figure this out the first time they wash a car with a garden hose. They stick their thumb in the stream to fan out faster moving water.

It's summer, get off here and go wash dad's car kid, stop bitching about shower heads. The second hand embarrassment is getting too much. If you're an adult go outside and play with a garden hose for a few minutes if the assisted care place will let you. I don't know what else to say.

Statistically, Uber/Lyft get into far fewer accidents than all the other drivers. And that's the only thing we should be comparing driverless taxis too... taxis.

You're comparing driverless taxis to teenagers in overpowered cars or assholes in oversized trucks instead of to taxis... Ubers, etc.

The experience won't be better or safer than an Uber/Lyft, and the assholes won't be trading in their fast cards and huge trucks to use taxis.

You made that up. Every social media service has tons of impersonator accounts being created, and you act like they can just pick up a red phone to the VPOTUS or whoever to verify each one. Far, far less damage is done by proactively blocking impersonators of VIPs, and in the rare one-time event they are actually intending to create an account either themselves or through a spokesperson they can have their account confirmed.