Comment: Re:Unfair (Score 1) 278
It works both ways. Noticing this requires not being a moronic grammar nazi though.
Comment: Re:Fruit flies ... (Score 1) 182
Comment: Nothing to see here... (Score 4, Informative) 138
Comment: Re:Not Much You Can Do About That (Score 3, Insightful) 197
Comment: Just one more round... (Score 4, Funny) 197
Comment: Re:Screen? (Score 4, Funny) 96
Comment: Re:Sudden outbreak of common sense, I guess (Score 2) 370
Considering how many links people click on over the course of the day, with hardly any idea (implicitly or explicitly) of what's going to be found on the other side...
Leaving intentional clicks to unknown locations aside, it hasn't been that long since it's been reasonably easy to be free of those endless rapidly spawning popups or the pop-up viruses installed by a drive-by. Without a law like this, how many little-old ladies would we have had to throw in prison under a strict per-decision interpretation for calling in the horrible things on their computer.
Comment: Re:manufacturing in brooklyn (Score 4, Interesting) 87
Rule 34 by Stross (yes, it's in reference to that Rule 34) has some interesting side content about the speculative future of a maker community. Printers and feedstock are relatively common, but most printers have embedded DRM related to IP purchase of the models.
With the current legal/IP trend it's a reasonable speculation as many companies would (with some justification) fear a consumer who could print physical devices as easily as they illegally download an MP3. So, from that perspective, clearly anyone with a DRM free printer has got to be some sort of criminal (yeah, yeah, there's that whole infringer/criminal thing, whatever).