Comment Re:Hard and expensive (Score 1) 218
It doesn't. What it means is cutting through a lot of big parcels whose owners have big money, so they can be big impediments. There has to be a happier medium than this between respect for individual private property ownership and the needs of the many, but we are clearly uninterested in finding it in this country.
The greater good...for who?
I mean, in an example....high speed rail from NYC to LA.
I don't know exactly which states they'd pass through, but let's just pick Iowa for shits and giggles.
Now...to keep things "high speed" that means you're NOT going to be stopping much at all between the two end points.
So, this would benefit people in CA and NY, but it gives NO benefit to people in Iowa who would have cities, farmland,all sorts of private properly they'd have to give up for the system.
Why the fuck would anyone in Iowa vote to give things up for this rail system they do not benefit from and actually gain hassle from...?