Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!
We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).
That is why I advocate the State taking DNA samples voluntarily at birth, and as a condition of first use of any tax-payer subsidized goods or services.
And I am not for releasing the tiger, either, in the case of unauthorized use of taxpayer goods or services. I think deportation is sufficient, to a country of their choosing, or with a taxpayer-supplied raft in international waters.
Same deal for not paying taxes, after first use of any tax-payer subsidized goods or services.
A Libertarian - no free-loaders on my taxes, get it? I grant you freedom from taxation.
Ha ha! Trick question.
"Ha ha! You fool! You fell victim to one of the classic blunders - The most famous of which is "never get involved in a land war in Asia" - but only slightly less well-known is this: "Never go against a Pander when karma is on the line"! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Ha ha ha... " (falls over dead...)
wicktionary: 4. conforming to the recognized standard of propriety, good taste, modesty, etc., as in behavior or speech.
dictionary (yeech) 1. conforming to the recognized standard of propriety, good taste, modesty, etc., as in behavior or speech.
A reasonable person would recognize that your rant does not have a "decent basis", because it is not conforming to the recognized standard of propriety, good taste, modesty, etc., as in behavior or speech... or writing.
I suspect your opinion differs, but in such case, you likely need to recognize the difference between the objective and the subjective.
I notice you had to switch dictionaries as well. Which do you use most often?
Hum. Which definition of "decent" are you using?
Apparently the obsolete one... not the second one, as in "a decent person".
Party? I thought you were having a rant, like you wrote. Just thought you could benefit from a little objectivity and reality, or a mirror, so you can see your situation and your pride as others can see it.
Glad to read your reasons for doing things, thanks for sharing. Thought provoking writing is one of the things I like about
Even though you and I are quite different, the journey with you is bracing.
Hum. Late for a wedding. That is always MY fault, not the fault of the other drivers, who have every right to expect me to drive with traffic while on our roads.
Hum. Lowering speed limits lowers death rates- I can die on the roads, you know, through no fault of my own. (well, I would have to assume some fault, if I were speeding... and maybe a person like you assumes I would have to assume some fault, if I got into an accident with a speeding driver...)
Hum. They do it to make money? Seems to me, he cut you a huge break. Not only did he lower the fine, but he lied about your speed, which could save you a bunch when your insurance rates go up. You do have insurance, don't you? You do expect your rates to go up, don't you? If not, your should google about how insurance works.
Hum. Did you make a risk/benefit analysis? I mean, for example, when you started your trip, determined to speed to save time, did you assess how much this would change your lateness? In other words, I assume you could have produced an estimate of how much you would be late, traveling at the speed limit, how much you would be late, speeding, and how much you would be late, speeding and being pulled over by an Officer of the Law (an obvious risk). Factored against those scenarios (good and bad), you would obviously add the risks and benefits of raised insurance costs, your death on the highways (that might make you even later), the deaths of others on the highways (that _could_ make you later, if you stopped), etc.
Hum. My annual rate of speeding citations is about 0.04. What is yours?
Ciao! A Pennsylvania Driver
But then again, I find subtlety in places others can not.
And, some would call me (CJP) a libertarian, but I get what you are saying- I see looters, and they are not the SOCIALISTs. I see Luddites, and I see the masses are pretty scary, and I see who really has change I can believe in. Perfect, no- better, and believable, yes.
Our founding fathers were members of a quite different tea party than we have today.
the average IQ in both states could rise.
Ah, this tasty bit reminds me of my youth, being a jokester on an internet poll. Almost sorry I got out of the business!
It is a nice way to be, and it is nice to see you be this way.
You catch more flies with honey than with vinegar.
Hi! I am Christofer Jee "sludge" Pander. I have a degree in journalism from BIOLA University. I am the proud owner of a schrammie, for my original song, "Swinging Dick Cheney, You Ruined My Birthday". My hobbies include hanging out on "Sound Politics", where I troll the few liberals stupid enough to read the postings, and I call people "Liar", and respond to their posts with pithy bon-mots like "False", and I do a little music. Look for me under my handle on Sound_Politics, "fudge_pucker"