Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:BSoD was an indicator (Score 1) 20

BSoD was telling you what was going on, but they made it difficult to understand what to do.

The BSoD only ever gave you enough information to tell you what driver crashed. Or a simple error code. It still does. That hasn't changed.

Error logs and crash reports could tell you a lot if you knew how to get to them. But since MS didnt make it easy or help the end user, it turned into its an MS problem and MS sucks.

Be careful what you wish for. Error logs and the tools are great and all, but if a user is unable to go read on the MSDN Docs how to debug something they will not have a hope in hell of understanding the debug output either. Kernel panics are no better in this regard either. The average user (heck the average poweruser) has no hope in hell of understanding what went wrong.

I think the problem is legacy, back when windows didn't have meaningful isolation between the kernel and drivers in userland it was trivial to bring down the system (hell Bill Gates did it live in front of a TV audience by plugging in a printer). That can most definitely be blamed on the OS, but that hasn't been the case now for 2 decades+.

Comment Re:From Volkswagon to Trumptruck (Score 1) 150

Honestly if it gets Americans to stop driving oversized pedestrian murdermachines then it may actually be something positive to come out of his administration. I mean to be clear it won't happen, and even if it did this isn't the intention, but still wouldn't it be nice to imagine a world where America's pedestrian accident rate was *not* increasing?

Comment Re:Huh? (Score 1) 150

and barely had enough power to get out of its own way.

Why do you need power? How badly designed are your roads that a small 3 cylinder 1000cc engine car can't safely reach highway speeds on the onramp? You want a racing car fine, but don't pretend that power is something anyone actually *needs* to commute to work.

Also I knew someone with a Mirage back in the day. The fit and finish matched every other car in its price range and was perfectly adequate for the purposes of going from A-B. I recommend not living in it, and maybe not using it to ferry Saudi Princes around, but beyond that it was a fuckload better than the Tesla of the day.

People like to imagine there's some great conspiracy that killed cheap cars in the USA, but the fact just was that the segment of the market that had the means to buy them, didn't want them.

There's no imagining here. There was a very specific action from the car companies lobbying to have exclusions for classes of vehicles from certain rules that resulted in a massive push to larger trucks becoming the standard.

Size matters, and by that I mean big things are often more expensive to produce. You complain about fit, finish, and price, but the Mirage given its size and engine in every way is much cheaper to put on the road than a large pickup or sedan. The fact that it isn't reflected in the price itself *IS THE CONSPIRACY*. You literally described it to us just now.

Comment Re:Never buy any product that requires... (Score 1) 114

It's not a necessity, but it certainly makes it a lot easier.

You contradict yourself. A product that isn't easy to use or setup in one or two clicks fails in the market. Hence cloud.

Optional cloud integration so you can control it remotely, fine, but the base functionality should be local.

While I agree, see the whole ease of use thing. Enshitification and dumbing down of everything is done because quite frankly most people are frigging useless when it comes to technology. The more options you have, the more rope you gave idiots with which to hang themselves. Most products are unfortunately designed for the commoner, not the techie in mind.

Actually my bigger gripe than this is that products which *do* have this functionality are often locked down to "professional installers". Like wtf. I bought the device, give me the god damn service code so I can configure it myself.

Comment Re:fuck this guy (Score 0) 42

You didn't have gopher?

I did. You know who didn't? Most people. Which meant the Internet was largely a source of information by a handful of nerds for a handful of nerds covering little more than a handful of nerd topics.

Yeah great you can find out how to compile a new Linux kernel. Whoope de fucking do. Where's a Dutch language video guide to how to replumb your shower? I could find great information to help my hobby of amateur radio, but how does it help the wife who has an interest in creating fancy cakes? It doesn't, because the content wasn't there.

The Internet was, and still is, more than http/https.

The internet's usefulness has nothing to do with the protocol. The point is the content, and back in its infancy it was a niche product for niche audiences with niche topics. Today it's being shat on by AI slop. But around the early 2010s it was a world of information about everything and anything you could imagine which made it most useful.

Comment Re:There are 5 former Warner employees... (Score 1) 69

That idea works in theory where there isn't any negatives. The problem is there always is. Your goal is to consume media. Do you care about quality? Netflix is the antithesis for that. Their goal is for you to consider them the second screen.

Second.

Not first. Not only. They are not trying to engage you. They want to be on in the background so you feel a connection to them to not cancel your service, essential noise while you doom scroll.

They have explicitly said as such and that is the reason many of their shows have fucking horrendous screenplays that would get you an F in a high school drama class. Like really basic don't do this 101 level shit such as expositing what is currently happening on the screen. You know... because they don't want you to actually watch the screen.

While too many streaming companies is a bad thing, nothing good comes from Warner Bros being dragged down to make absolutely fucking rubbish at the direction of Netflix's upper management - which Netflix is objectively doing.

Comment Re:416e9, really? (Score 1) 42

Does your browser advertise itself as a web crawler? But let's math this shit!

You are a human. I suspect when you browse it takes you a good 10-20 seconds to make a connection, wait, receive a captcha, re-evaluate and context switch, and attempt to switch to another website. That's conservatively 6 attempts per minute. I assume you need to eat, drink, shower, shit and sleep so let's say you spend every other moment constantly battling Cloudflare like a lunatic even professionally while you work. That's 16 hours a day, 960minutes, or 5760 attempts per day. Or a total of 875,520. There'd need to be close to 500,000 of you lunatics doing this all day, every day, every waking moment, continuously for 5 months to match this number.

Somehow I think even if you did get get stuck in a captcha, and it did get counted ... I don't mean to belittle you but you're quite insignificant in this number.

Comment Re:fines (Score 1) 90

I've never seen a human pass a school bus, and I see school buses daily.

I've never seen one run a red light, but I know someone who was hospitalised when it happened to them. This stuff happens all the time. Pretending that humans don't is the same side of silly bias you apply to villainising Waymo.

Yeah Waymos aren't perfect, but what they are is programmatically consistent. It's like people who don't know the law about not doing U-turns at a red light (illegal in my city but you see people do it all the time out of ignorance).

There's a difference between a mistake and ignorance of the rules. Waymo falls under the latter. The difference is when this is addressed it will be done across the fleet, while a human you fix on a case by case basis.

should get copies of ALL self drive vehicle video until they prove they are safer than humans.

We have that. The very company you vilify has a far better track record than a human driver. Maybe not for breaking some rule, but definitely for actual incidents. Note that as yet a Waymo has never hit a school kid, or person, it did hit a dog and cat at one point though.

At the moment, we simply must take their word for it that they perform.

No that is false, all incidents involving self driving vehicles need to be reported. What we're talking their word for is that they aren't breaking minor road rules that lead to no outcome.

Slashdot Top Deals

An optimist believes we live in the best world possible; a pessimist fears this is true.

Working...