Comment Re:The cognitive dissonance is so funny (Score 1) 97
Rolling back emissions standards one day and then calling for small fuel efficient cars the next doesn't make much sense.
Rolling back emissions standards one day and then calling for small fuel efficient cars the next doesn't make much sense.
He spewed gibberish a solid decade ago https://www.snopes.com/fact-ch... and lots of people said this would be a bad idea. But the smooth brains doubled down and here we are. The emperor has no clothes.
This your guy?
https://www.cnn.com/2025/12/02...
https://newrepublic.com/post/2...
https://www.washingtonpost.com...
Here's video of cheeto falling asleep white people continue to kiss his ass. https://people.com/donald-trum...
Almost like grandpa has lost his marbles and someone should take his keys.
Yeah, it's not even worth considering for something like 15-20kg. A full pallet in this case is 464kg
The current "AI" is a predictive engine.
And *you* are a predictive engine as well; prediction is where the error metric for learning comes from. (I removed the word "search" from both because neither work by "search". Neither you nor LLMs are databases)
It looks at something and analyzes what it thinks the result should be.
And that's not AI why?
AI is, and has always been, the field of tasks that are traditionally hard for computers but easy for humans. There is no question that these are a massive leap forward in AI, as it has always been defined.
It is absolutely crazy that we are all very very soon going to lose access to electricity
Calm down. Total AI power consumption (all forms of AL, both training and inference) for 2025 will be in the ballpark of 50-60TWh. Video gaming consumes about 350TWh/year, and growing. The world consumes ~25000 TWh/yr in electricity. And electricity is only 1/5th of global energy consumption.
AI datacentres are certainly a big deal to the local grid where they're located - in the same way that any major industry is a big deal where it's located. But "big at a local scale" is not the same thing as "big at a global scale." Just across the fjord from me there's an aluminum smelter that uses half a gigawatt of power. Such is industry.
That "ruler study" was ancient. It's mentioned in peer review at least as early as 2018, and might be even older.
Believe it or not, people in the field are familiar with these sorts of things that you just read about.
Most of these new AI tools have gained their new levels of performance by incorporating Transformers in some form or another, in part or in whole. Transformers is the backend of LLMs.
Even in cases where Transformers isn't used these days, often it's imitated. For example, the top leaderboards in vision models are a mix of ViTs (Vision Transformers) and hybrids (CNN + transformers), but there are still some "pure CNNs" that are high up. But the best performing "pure CNNs" these days use techniques modeled after what Transformers is doing, e.g. filtering data with an equivalent of attention and the like.
The simple fact is that what enabled LLMs is enabling most of this other stuff too.
Jevons Intensifies
"You really think the region ruled by Hamas would end up being better for both the Jews and the other residents? After all their acts from Oct 7th on?"
You don't seem to be paying attention to the actions of Israel from October 7 on. Or before it for that matter. Why is that?
By stay away do you mean stop funding it? If so, how do I subscribe to your newsletter?
I wonder if it was supposed to be used in lost PLA casting and then wasn't, or if they were just very very stupid
Has there ever been a merger flat out denied in the past 50 years? At most we get a few back and forths with some lip service about being better for the consumer.
Has a merger ever decreased prices?
Looks like the device can also report status. I'm buying one just for the feature of letting me know the door is open after a certain time.
"Pok pok pok, P'kok!" -- Superchicken