Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:That Moment (Score 1) 320

by K. S. Kyosuke (#40129699) Attached to: 350-Year-Old Newton's Puzzle Solved By 16-Year-Old

is your software proven to be fault-free?

is your hardware proven to be fault-free? (have you ever read the list of errata for a modern CPU?)

if your software puts out a human readable (and verifiable) form of the proof everything is fine, if not you can only talk about probabilities not about proof.

First, you have to ask the same thing about mathematicians' brains and abilites (organic HW and SW). Second, of course that a proof assistant has to be able to print out a trace of the reasoning process. That's the whole point (or one of them).

Comment: Re:That Moment (Score 4, Insightful) 320

by K. S. Kyosuke (#40128659) Attached to: 350-Year-Old Newton's Puzzle Solved By 16-Year-Old

Computing tends to be a brute force analysis of all the possible inputs.

Hello? We've had symbolic computing ever since 1960's. There are many software tools today to assist mathematicians with creating and verifying proofs (e.g, Coq is probably the best known one). What's wrong with using them? Not to do that would be like using a pencil and paper instead of typing when you're preparing a publication – I'd think that brain power and time should be used constructively.

Comment: To use the bad car analogy... (Score 1) 551

by CajunArson (#40116331) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Why Not Linux For Security?

This is like saying: Some companies have prevented their drivers from parking their cars in the bad part of town (i.e. the cloud). These guys all drive Fords, but I drive a Chevy. So why not leave my Chevy in the bad part of town instead!

Oh wait...

I'm pretty sure DropBox runs its servers on Linux, but that's completely beside the point. Guess what's more secure? A fileserver that you own and physcially control that happens to be running Windows that's properly configured with strong ACLs and sits behind a VPN gateway... or a Linux powered PHP CMS setup that is leased from one of your competitors and is accessible to anyone who can guess a username/passwor combo?

Guess what: that example doesn't mean that "Linux is not secure" or that "only Windows is secure" either. Frankly, BOTH can be insecure and BOTH can be secure based on the usage and competency of the people who set them up.

Comment: Copyright == tech I don't like (Score 1) 574

by Weaselmancer (#40105897) Attached to: Fox Sues Dish Over "Auto Hop" Ad-Skipping Feature

Fox claims that giving viewers the ability to skip commercials on recorded television shows demonstrates the "clear goal of violating copyrights and destroying the fundamental underpinnings of the broadcast television ecosystem."

You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

Just to clear things up. Just because someone comes up with tech you don't like, that doesn't mean that you can claim "copyright violation". If it is okay to record all of it, then it must be okay to record part of it. And before you ask, no you can't file a DMCA takedown notice either.

Oh, and destroying underpinnings is called capitalism. Ask anyone who manufactures buggy whips these days. Oh that's right, automobiles destroyed the buggy industry's underpinnings. I forgot.

Questions are never indiscreet, answers sometimes are. -- Oscar Wilde

Working...