Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:I Give Up (Score 1) 489

by Amorymeltzer (#39706453) Attached to: Student Charged For Re-selling Textbooks

Other forms of slavery were toppled by people comming to their senses. The fall of intellectual property will be the same.

In the USA at least, slavery was toppled by a gruesome and bloody war, after which the justice system allowed a system only slightly less worse to become institutionalized for over 100 years.

Comment: Re:Rybka was made by plagiarizing a GPL program. (Score 1) 206

by Amorymeltzer (#39557249) Attached to: Rybka Solves the King's Gambit Chess Opening

Slashdot ought to be ashamed to give publicity to cheats and thieves.

But I read about politicians on here almost every day!

In all seriousness, though, just because they're bad doesn't mean it's not noteworthy or news for nerds. The hacktivist stories are a good example. The legality of actions may or may not (in this case) be worth debating, but we should be able to divorce that from other stories that are, on their own, worth discussing.

Comment: Re:"Pay for article here" (Score 1) 36

by Amorymeltzer (#39168679) Attached to: Optical Memory Could Speed Up the Internet

This work was supported by the National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (NICT).

NICT, for the record, is in Japan, so unless you are a Japanese taxpayer (who, based on your sig, also feels very strongly about slavery during the 1860s in the USA) no, you do not own the article.

Comment: Re:Not a bug (Score 1) 57

by Amorymeltzer (#38806327) Attached to: Princeton Team Casts More Doubt On Arsenic DNA Claims

How am I supposed to take the summary seriously when it refers to the scientists as a "team of researchers"? They aren't actually a group of players on the same side in a competitive sport!

Maybe we just use different words to mean different things in different contexts, especially when they have a different but slightly related and understandable similarity to the original meaning.

Comment: Re:Science! (Score 0, Flamebait) 57

by Amorymeltzer (#38806233) Attached to: Princeton Team Casts More Doubt On Arsenic DNA Claims

This is how science works!

You just proved your own point. Science works by independent replication of large claims, so when a large claim is made people try to reproduce it. Nobody in the scientific community wants just one proof of a concept, so others aggressively, if you will, seek to either reject or support the original conclusion. If nobody challenged them, it'd be the least scientific move possible, it'd look like the Catholic Church.

Dealing with the problem of pure staff accumulation, all our researches ... point to an average increase of 5.75% per year. -- C.N. Parkinson

Working...