Comment Re:Mozilla has no clue how to version software (Score 1) 172
...I've been promoting it since Phoenix,...
I've still got my Firefox "Take Back The Web" t-shirt.
.
Maybe there should be a "Take Back Firefox" t-shirt....
...I've been promoting it since Phoenix,...
I've still got my Firefox "Take Back The Web" t-shirt.
.
Maybe there should be a "Take Back Firefox" t-shirt....
Just because the other browsers have problems it doesn't mean that Firefox doesn't have problems of its own....
It's Mozilla's problems, not Firefox's.
.
Mozilla has become so full of itself, it's lost in a cul-de-sac of self-importance.
Mozilla needs to grow past the "we know better" phase and start listening to its users again.
Unless and until Mozilla does that, Firefox will continue losing market share to Chrome.
...You know what, guys? Get over it....
Maybe Mozilla should "get over it", bring Firefox back to its roots, and stop making Firefox more and more bloated with superficial features whilst significant architectural issues remain unresolved.
.
.... If they are storing their photos on facebook, they ARE storing them in the cloud....
In a general sense, correct.
.
However, when I said "cloud-based storage" I meant the cloud service was a storage service, not a social media service. If I had meant facebook, I would have said cloud-based social media service.
They could just delete most of the photos after they age a bit, analyzing it with some of their AI whiz-bang software....
More than a few of my [real world] friends use facebook as their archive for photos, eschewing local or cloud-based storage for their historical family photos. They would be unhappy if facebook were to randomly start deleting photos just because they've been on facebook for a period of time.
.
Of course, I've told those friends that facebook may not have the same photo-preservation goals as they do, but they seem to be unconcerned.
...but this particular comparison is...
Thanks, that is what I meant to imply.
... it's just a little more than 1% the size of OpenSSL...Notably, s2n does not provide all the additional cryptographic functions that OpenSSL provides in libcrypto, it only provides the SSL/TLS functions....
So then, aren't size comparisons between OpenSSL and s2n at best useless, and at worst intentionally misleading?
.
I post an opinion here and it is mod'd as flamebait. Must be some Apple fanboys around.....
...Most recently, there have been concerns over its computer systems' vulnerability, and Chinese hackers have possibly stolen classified data related to the project....
Most people here...
Most other people...
most people care...
A self-appointed spokesperson for "most people"?
and what about the tens of thousands of UPSes, printers, KVMs, IP cameras, thermocouples and other embedded crap all which only responds to SSL v3 ?...
Once the RFC "passes", they are out of standard.
.
I had to replace my 11-year-old wireless access point because it did only SSL3 and my browsers refused to connect to it in their default configuration. Even though the firmware in the access point is upgradeable, Netgear stopped supporting that unit long ago.
So what about all the devices that are not upgradeable? Well, the first thing is not to expose them to insecure networks....
New York... when civilization falls apart, remember, we were way ahead of you. - David Letterman