OK, good, I already understand that linking Apache and GPL code is a bad idea (though Apache and LGPL much less bad to completely OK depending on the details).

I thought that you were suggesting some problem between Eclipse and Apache that had completely passed me by.

(FWIW, I try to license code Apache 2 as far as possible to maximise the number of places that that code can be used.)

Rgds

Damon

Would you please expand on "The same applies to anything Apache licensed." for me?

Rgds

Damon

If you look at my code for example at random.hd.org then you'll notice that it's something that user space can do just as well. The kernel has no magic other than direct access to a few more noisy things.

Rgds

Damon

+1

The security should work independently of details of the underlying medium and without relying on its exact implementation. A byte stream (observed or not) is just that. Likewise an unreliable packet stream.

This is what we have abstraction for.

Rgds

Damon

That's at least three sorts of nonsense:

https://www.fourmilab.ch/hotbi...

https://www.random.org/

http://random.hd.org/

The OS has no magic either, or are you saying that it's random seeds all the way down?

Rgds

Damon

Oooooo, thanks for that. Damaged one of my eyes falling off a Segway (1st world geek problem or what?) and anything that helps is welcome!

Rgds

Damon

We don't have peak demand from aircon in the UK (GB grid) either. Ours comes on (winter) evenings when, for example, meals are being cooked for kids home from school.

Do you have a link to your utility's site?

Yes, of course you shouldn't take my word on spec over your local guy's, but I'm stubbornly continuing to assert that your local load profile can't be completely flat and with rock-steady frequency even if not as tortured as elsewhere.

For reference here's my 'local' grid (GB) live balancing stats:

http://www.bmreports.com/bsp/b...

I am truly sympathetic to your wish to overcomplicating things and making them more complex and fragile: I just don't think this stuff will be 'over'-complexity for a huge chunk of the purchasers, it will be more like an essential and pay for itself in upfront balancing payments off the purchase cost in many cases.

Here are a few of my wacky ideas on the topic, one of which got me through the first round of a competition sponsored by National Grid and another of which has been discussed with an electricity supplier:

http://www.earth.org.uk/domest...

I will still try to turn some of these into niche (but simple) versions of consumer products. You only buy these ones if they meet a need for you and no one else is lumbered with the extra complexity...

Rgds

Damon

Goodness, that's rather offhand and completely wrong at lots of levels.

Clearly there a peaks at national and supra-national level. Have a look at some of these for just one example:

http://www.bmreports.com/bsp/b...

Flattening demand would reduce costs of infrastructure that otherwise has to cope with unrestrained peaks; we already do this so it is only a matter of degree and where exactly we do it. Further, allowing demand to follow non-dispatchable load will also help make better use of renewables as well as cope with failure of conventional plant more gracefully.

Also, different parts of the grid will have different problems, eg while the grid may be fine overall at a given moment one substation may be having a torrid time with its much smaller consumer sample, eg that may have a bunch of locals arriving off the same bus or train putting the water for a cuppa, or have a cable fault in one phase, or whatever.

Further, sensible secure schemes will devolve as much as possible of the detailed timing to the appliance so that they cannot all be commanded to 'come on' or 'go off' at once but apply a randomisation algorithm much as Ethernet does for example.

Just because you may have decided up front that there are no good solutions doesn't mean there aren't any. Some of the people that have them know a lot more about stats than you and I both, so can we at least accept that there are entire chunks of maths and computing that have interesting secure distributed randomised algorithms that deal with exactly these sorts of issues all the time?

Rgds

Damon

So, I'm all in favour of efficiency, but it's invariably seen as some kind of left wing conspiracy at least in the US and UK in certain sections of the population and politics.

Thanks to that improved efficiency my (somewhat larger and nicer) fridge/freezer uses half the energy of my previous one and I don't call being gouged on price, for example, though I remain cross with some misrepresentation by the manufacturer.

Our government has been rather cynically watering down building efficiency standards for very short term and minimal savings while condemning people to a future of inflated bills, which it also complains about. Also our trades seem often to regard the care required to improve building performance as an assault on their manliness or something.

Remember also that shifting and reduction are separate worthy goals. A more efficient device that drew all its power at the least good moments would be sub-optimal.

We have to work on all fronts, even if not ideal.

Rgds

Damon

Have you looked at the credit ratings of, for example, the big EU utilities?

The tone of your text is unnecessarily harsh and I think that you are also completely wrong factually.

Rgds

Damon

If you want to claim absolute rights to kill or maim others in order not to bother putting a sweater on, then I'd go along with that.

The world is not binary and we don't have absolute rights to do unnecessary things that hurt others.

72F is warmer than I would like a house, and might be foolish if you haven't bothered insulating and/or are expecting others to subsidise you, eg with external effects of burning coal on their health, but I can't really see 72F as being a felony on its own.

Rgds

Damon

You can only adjust the frequency of the whole grid by adding or removing gigawatts of load (or generation)! Or have the same effect by cutting into someone's mains supply and mucking around with it directly, in which case they might as well blow up all the target's stuff outright!

So the point is is possible to do some stuff with *NO* additional comms or security hazards, and some with some highly secure comms and very constrained changes in behaviour with those comms across the Internet or not. All are useful.

Rgds

Damon

Slippery-slope arguments are rather weak by themselves: what happened if we were to accept any old slippery slope argument, what would happen next?

However, it is true that the energy system is changing, since for all sorts of reasons we can't carry on as we were; one element of the new system will be trying to get people to use preferentially energy when it is abundant and defer use when it is not. ToD pricing and dynamic demand are two likely elements of that.

Rgds

Damon

I don't know your situation and location of course but it it highly likely that your utility guy is simply wrong. I'd be most surprised if any significant grid does not need "balancing" services of some sort. Some of those can be provided centrally or distributed over appliances. Both have some costs in terms of energy, and both have other cons and pros.

Tell me more about your service district; I'm intrigued.

Rgds

Damon

You are wrong.

The change from selling more energy to selling services which happen to involve energy is called "decoupling", eg selling streetlighting rather than the energy to run street lights. The market is already changing and demand falling and utilities are up sh*t creek if they don't change to avoid a "death spiral".

Eg http://uk.reuters.com/article/...

Rgds

Damon