Comment Re:Java? (Score 1) 197
Go sit in a corner! Thou shalt never bring those two words in close proximity, for should they ever come in contact, the reaction could destroy reality as we know it!
Go sit in a corner! Thou shalt never bring those two words in close proximity, for should they ever come in contact, the reaction could destroy reality as we know it!
I didn't see SystemC, either, but may have missed it. But the real question is what the stats would look like if you only included Wishbone-compliant usage?
There should have been modifiers for typical bugs per kloc and security holes per kloc.
Also, there are many more layers to the industry. Scientific computing? Avionics? Publishing?
The subdivisions between languages are also a bit... strange. Java/Oak isn't truly uniform, whatever anyone claims. C and C++ have standards that aren't always backwards-compatible - if you ignore such changes, why bother listing C# or D as distinct? Lump the lot, together with B and BCPL under a single header.
My guess is that accurate representation of languages isn't possible (when does a dialect become a distinct language?) but that if it was, none of the so-called "big three" languages would be in the top 10. Computer languages are as bad as natural languages when it comes to classifiers.
Last, but by no means least, people rarely directly code any more. They code within engines, usually using some weird fringe language nobody has ever heard of that turns out to be Lua or Visual Basic with the keywords words renamed for the theme. Real programmers (as opposed to integer or complex programmers) tend to be in the minority, have become rarer after Qualcomm outlawed them, and are mostly in mourning for Freshmeat. But as a lot are Goths anyway, it's hard to tell.
Already done. Check the Slashdot archives for the Vi vs Emacs paintball fight.
When I were a lad, we had to program in 96 bytes! In the snow! Uphill! Both ways!
Says someone who is posting on a fabulously successful discussion site written in... Perl.
Most of the Info pages are rips of the Man pages. Only a handful of programs have "real" Info documentation. Not that this matters, you just need to run man first for the summary and then info for more detailed stuff. The heavy documentation is only useful for really obscure stuff.
Of course it's an exercise in mystical frustration! Linus Torvalds was declared God at the first Linux conference, Richard Stallman is head of the Church of GNU (that's what it says on his website) and Eric Raymond runs a bazaar outside a cathedral.
... including, at times, itself.
It seems more likely that if you want to use a gun to kill yourself, you will buy one.
You've had a shit day at the office, so you set off for the gun store, and on the way there you start to calm down, and there's a nice sunset so you turn round and go home, have a few beers and fall asleep. Then in the morning you go "shit, what was I thinking?"
or
You've had a shit day at the office, so you pull the gun out from under the pillow and shoot yourself with it.
Which is better? Which is more likely?
All I did was float around the Big Pond (East coast) in Uncle Sam's Yacht Club DURING the Vietnam era.
I don't know why you call it the big pond, it's smaller than the one on the other side.
Still, you were maintaining a state of preparedness & covering the other flank in case the Frogs, Limeys or Krauts got up to something.
There's a metal for those wounded in combat
Usually it's lead. Though it might be cold steel.
It's Irish, actually.
You mean you don't think typical jurors are smart enough to form their own opinion of what he's saying?
It's his job to do the best he can to secure a guilty verdict. It's another guy's job to do the opposite, and yet another's to keep things fair.
With your bare hands?!?