Well, yes, of course. When Microsoft throws that much software license cuts and maybe a few junkets for the mucky-mucks in exotic places for âoeconferencesâ, well, this is the way it goes.
Is there anyone who really thought it would go any other way?
Yes.
...has an well-trained group of mercenaries that specialize in identifying, infiltrating, and disrupting social movements which threaten the profits of the ruling classes...
USDollars are merely imagined by the USGovernment.
Oh they are "merely imagined" by a lot more than just the US Government. And that's why they have actual value.
I'm not really a fan of any "altcurrency", but this guy just comes of sounding whiney and self-serving.
That's because we've figure out how to monetize it. The "for profit prison', means it is a persons patriotic duty to be incarcerated, to help drive the economy.
Or perhaps we Americans are much more prone to violent and illegal activities (gun crimes, theft, fraud, and so on...) that are likly to get you incarcerated? Americans as a whole are much less inclined than many European societies to actuall participate in scoiety with a goal of "getting along". We are an "I've Got Mine, Fuck You" sort of people.
...when Australia had the reputation, especially with conservatives, as being "America done right." How times have changed!
I'm not sure how this law suit falls outside that view...
He found that the parasitic and the host plants were exchanging thousands of mRNA molecules between each other, thus creating a conversation.
I think this is a little bit of a misuse / misunderstanding of the term / concept "communication".
What the hell type of tag is that? I mean, it works, but what the hell? Is that Slashdot-specific, or did I miss some change to HTML?
He thinks Slashdot uses BBcode.
I think: "File Not Found".
Bad linky...
A series of self-portraits taken by Indonesian monkeys has sparked a copyright dispute between Wikipedia and a British wildlife photographer, says Wikipedia is using his copyrighted images without permission. Photographer David Slater complained that Wikipedia rejected his requests for the images to be removed from the website. Although the monkeys pressed the button, Slater set up the self-portraits by framing them and setting the camera on a tripod. The Wikimedia Foundation claims that no one owns the copyright to the images, because under U.S. law, 'copyright cannot vest in non-human authors', the monkeys in this case.
Do you not look at who you're responding to? That's Frosty Piss, one of our biggest trolls. And now you support his position.
One of the "biggest trolls"? Really? Unlike you, I post *all* my comments logged in, and yet still have "excellent karma"...
Sure, but the post office could still reject this custom crypto-stamp based of the fact that it's obvious something covert is going on. And you can bet that when that envelope arrives in China, they will take great interest in it, and its unfortunate recipient.
comcrap or slime warner
Do you also type "Micro$oft"?
Grow up.
New York... when civilization falls apart, remember, we were way ahead of you. - David Letterman
