your [html] skills are not very impressive.
And so, all these "well armed" people. Deluded. Meeting up with other well armed people to talk about being well armed, shooting holes at bogeys in their minds and Ignorantly re-parsing 18th century English texts as their children run around at their feet, loving it, emulating, fingering safety locks and shooting their kid sisters in the head. It's worth bearing in mind that a well-armed militia would be called an insurgency these days and would be met with a well-armed government. It's hard for me imagine any kind of scenario where the "well armed" would actually "win' any kind of serious test of their well-armedness. In short, they'd get their arse kicked.
The "well-armed militia" people basically have to assume that there is a simultaneous mass uprising and/or wholesale mutiny by the armed forces in order for them to succeed.
In either of these situations, it is irrelevant whether you start off with a few guns in private hands or not.
A true mass uprising can only be defeated by killing half the population, and that is just not the way things go. And if you don't have a mutiny, the armed forces will always outgun the few patriots with hunting rifles and handguns.
It is incredibly easy to talk about revolution, opposing the government and so on, but to actually achieve something requires political organisation, not stockpiling a few assault rifles.