What I find amusing is that many of the videos of people being polled and displaying their ignornce are on college campuses. Some even at social rallies against environmental dangers.

SIxty-four dollars for a T. Massive storage not relying on internet access or someone's machine crapping out. If you have a computer and internet, that's well within your demo.

That catapults it from no to fuck no. Smells very much like scam.

Boko Haram would be the true hate group in your little screed.

You are axiomatically incorrect, they just demonstrated the power they have. And, pard, it *did* shit on Jews and was not shuttered for it. You're purposefully ignorant.

Add to that, every fatwa changes the brand.

How many non-Muslim people do you know who will open themselves up to terrorist attack to speak out against injustice?

I can point to twelve pretty quickly.

How about we queue people of the same religion as those of each at of terrorism who publicly reacted with shock at what was done and compare lines?

"Are you really claiming that all people with violent articles of faith have no hair?" This is a deceitful misconstruing of what he said. You already know that, however.

There's a distinct difference between provoking by hurting someone's feelings and actively counseling murder. Hebdo did the former, the Imams do the latter. If one finds the two equivalent, one needs to look in the mirror.

Utterly unsustainable (and very liberal) "solution". You cannot shunt ever increasing numbers of unemployed workers into schools being paid for by the current workers. Other people's money always runs out.

Unless you can come up with, and state, what you feel is the acceptable percentage of the population leaching off of the rest and defend your logic, you haven't give this serious thought.

Oh bull. If it's open to everyone and everyone used it, it would cost everyone the cost of the "gift" plus bureaucratic handling, which is the actual point of the thing. Free (as you try to use it) is fine though high school. If someone can't get their ass in gear by eighteen, screw them.

"Is there really a need to depict religious figures of any belief system to convey the intended message?" Since when does need enter into the equation of how someone wants to convey a message? And exactly who gets to decide the "need"?

Could you perhaps share your reasoning?

I think you meant "To be pedantic,".