"You want to know why Japan never tried an attack on the US mainland? They knew the citizens outgunned their army 40 to 1."
Bullshit. It was a logistic issue. Admiral Yamamoto noted that they lost the war the moment they attacked Pearl Harbor. Why? Logistics.

Nice quote from someone who never existed. Oh, do you mean Isoroku Yamamoto? He did exist, but he never said that quote.

Just like every other made up fact by the pro gun morons.

I'll have mine with two big hands painted on the sides XD

Sorry, first *widebody* plane with outward-opening cargo doors...and also the first widebody plane.

Outward-opening cargo doors are standard on airliners nowadays, the 747 was the first to have them.

I'm not sure that having all of that water impact the ground before spreading would be that useful. Having the water spread out in a long spray probably is better at suppressing a fire.

Indeed. Also, with analyst reports the first question should always be, who paid the analyst. This analyst has much of the traditional automobile industry as customers. But not Tesla. Telling customers what they want to hear is good business for analysts.

Irrelevant when ISIS will kill you.

t it. They don't seem bad. But what type of person rises to the top in those events?
The same type of person who won't give up power to a stable government.
Basically,you are arming warlords, and not citizenry of a large single government.

".. because that works against our interest in keeping the region destabilized. I.."
I see.

*Backs out slowly*

Take you expected costs, double it, then throw the piece of paper way because it's still useless.

That drive me up the wall. Why have an entry level phone? the manufacturing costs between 16 and 64 is tiny. Why support some many phone types? just make 1 64GB phone.

And I ask the in earnest. What data support the cost of different lines vs/ the cost of all of them being 64GB?

what is crappy about it?
How does it relate to autocorrect software?

Texas can't secede. The original agreement was changed decades ago.

Turns out, that's not true.
Arming locals in an unstable environment has been the continuing problem with all modern conflicts in the mid-east.

It kind of made sense in the 50s, when the government was reasonably stable and before religious zealots started getting government power.