Oh, to be naive like you and think things run the way they "should".
I understand quite well how things run. I also understand how things should run. And I understand those are two different things. Now please crawl back under your bridge.
So, please do show us what law she's disregarding.
Did she break the law? Probably. Did she disregard the law? Almost certainly. But the fact that she apparently destroyed any incriminating evidence (if there was any) makes that difficult to prove. To main point is that she was not the one to decide what should be archived and what should be destroyed.
One of the biggest problems in American education is that teachers have to teach 30 students with different learning styles at the same time.
At some point that is pretty much an irreducible problem.
The problem is easily solved, but the solution is not politically correct: Don't jumble 30 students of all different capabilities and intelligence levels together.
Instead they system tends toward mainstreaming so the little snowflakes get exposed to people who are special, instead of getting an education.
And it should be the law: If you use the word `paradigm' without knowing what the dictionary says it means, you go to jail. No exceptions. -- David Jones
