Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:So 1 x F35 = 60 million x vaccinations? (Score 1) 124

The vaccine probably wouldn't go to everyone, it would go to high-risk people, such as nurses, doctors, and people traveling to west africa (much like visitors to some countries get vaccines for yellow fever).

In my case, I would be more likely to die driving to the hospital for the vaccine, than I would be of Ebola.

Comment Re:His main points (Score 1) 289

in the same way that George Washington set a precedent by stepping down after two terms as President (he could very well have crowned himself if he wanted), I'm waiting to see if Larry Page's Google will set a precedent before I pass final judgment on Google's corporate existence

What kind of precedent are you hoping Larry Page will set?

Comment Re:The Internet is our best weapon (Score 1) 289

Even so, a number of governments have already fallen or been pressured by it; we see repressive regimes like China throwing all kinds of defenses up against it. I don't see how even China can stand against it for very long. Assange gets this, at least on some level. That would mean America wins

I don't think that follows. If a country ends up with a better government because of the internet, the citizens of that country win.

Comment Re:How hard is it to recognize a stoplight? (Score 1) 287

I'm curious: why do you think that's at all relevant to any other part of this thread?

Well, if you're curious, I believe this conversation was started with this earlier point of mine:

"And that is even before getting to the engineering problem of reliable software. When Boeing built their recent airline software package, it took 5-8 years to get something that was reliable enough for air travel."

Which is a comment on the difficulty of making reliable software. It's referring to the engineering aspect of the matter, that making software without (serious) bugs is very difficult and takes time. Since the software for self-driving cars will be much more complicated than the software for air travel, it follows naturally that making the software reliable will be even more difficult.

My point being, that even if the car could already drive itself anywhere, it would still be many years away from production.

Comment His main points (Score 5, Informative) 289

His main points, as I understand them:

1) Eric Schmidt is getting involved in politics, and is becoming influential.
2) Google doesn't always follow "do no evil" but fanboys love Google anyway
3) Google is getting involved in government more than is healthy.

He has some other rambles about the Bilderbergs, and how the governments are secretly controlling world events, but his main points seam reasonable enough.

Comment Re:Oh yeah, that guy (Score 4, Insightful) 289

At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought.

Seriously? I'm not sure you read the same thing I did. I especially found his attempts to understand his interviewers (in the opening paragraphs) to be unusually analytical and.....rational.

Certainly Assange holds different viewpoints than I do, but his points seemed more logic based than your post, for example.

Slashdot Top Deals

Today is a good day for information-gathering. Read someone else's mail file.

Working...