Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment No-one can (Score 1) 71

Can you provide a link to those 300 pages proving that we're "going to pay and pay"?

No, just like you can't prove that's not the case - because NONE of that is public.

All you can do is react to past experience when hundreds of pages of regulations are about to affect something that was working quite well.

And I doubt those 300 pages are all about net neutrality

Good luck with blind faith in large organizations that do not care about anything but growing themselves. I'm sure it will end well for you.

Net neutrality is a simple concept.

It is, isn't it...

Now you are starting to catch on.

Comment Re:could not keep watching it (Score 4, Insightful) 145

I was going to say people aren't that stupid.

But then I remembered that old episode of The Wire where they stick a kid's hand on a copier machine, ask him questions like it's a lie detector, and after he answers, a detective presses the copy button and "LIE" on a piece of paper comes out. The kid actually fell for it when the detectives structured the questions to show he was lying and he broke down and revealed the truth of the incident and gave them their lead.

Found it, apparently based on real life Baltimore PD interrogation techniques:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

So I guess they could make this new CSI Cyber even 10x more stupid, and a few months later you'd probably start hearing from people something like...

the NSA can use coffee cups to playback conversations from half an hour ago because of reverberating echoes still trapped inside the cup.

(I just made that up, CSI writing team: give me attribution please.)

Comment Re:Even worse - extensions == "chmod +x" ?!? (Score 1) 564

Alternatively, you can say that file exension is metadata distinct from the name

No you can't. They are set and read together in both the primary APIs, and virtually every UI.

And yes, it is a crappy way to do it, but it's the one that became the de facto standard. Changing it now is very costly, and cannot be done unilaterally.

Oh it'll certainly change. It's just a matter of when. The precursors are already there. UIs hiding the file extensions from users. Internet protocols using mime types rather than file extensions.

It'd certainly be perfectly possible to have an OS and file system right now that did it and interoperated perfectly well with the rest of the world. It's just a matter of defaulting to file extensions when communicating with something dumb.

Comment Re:C++ important on Apple too (Score 1) 407

For example virtual functions require an extra level of indirection over C function calls.

You are wrong, doubly wrong actually.
(1) If the class is not using inheritance you don't get the indirection.

If you're not using inheritance then you won't use a virtual function. (Did you read what I wrote?)

If you need the abstraction/indirection then you are simply doing your own indirection manually in C code.

Not necessarily. Just because you might do things with objects in C++ doesn't mean the code would be written as pseudo objects in C.

You missed the point. Its not that google is using C++ libraries, its that they are writing their libraries in C++.

Portable libraries. It makes no fucking difference whether the library was written within the same conglomerate.

Plus you are doubly wrong again since people also use C++ in Apple targets for portability.

Are you hard of thinking? That was the one exception I made. Using portable libraries. However if the library intended to be portable starts on OSX, then it's virtually always written in C.

Comment Re:Good operating systems Dont. (Score 1) 564

Mac OS did too. Not as a mimetype, but at least separate from the name.

And BeOS died for reasons other than this.

The compatibility issue used to be a problem when we all shared physical media. These days as most remote files come from the internet, and generally has metadata when it does so, this is perfectly workable. e.g. Anything that comes over HTTP has a MIME-TYPE provided the server is not broken.

Comment Re:Atlantis (Score 1) 114

you want people to learn from history. studying war artifacts does not promote war. in fact, studying war artifacts might prevent war. like studying the wreck of a slaving ship won't make people become slavers, but might educate future generations about the vile slave trade to affirm our revulsion to slavery

Comment Re:Hmmmm! (Score 0, Troll) 517

The G.O.P. is the party of stupid

The G.O.P. even introduced the term

http://thehill.com/video/in-th...

But among Jindal's most provocative suggestions was the demand that the GOP needed to "stop insulting the intelligence of voters" — and display more intelligence itself. Jindal's comments seemed targeted squarely at conservative candidates in Senate races whose comments on rape and abortion appeared to torpedo their electoral chances.

"We had a number of Republicans damage the brand this year with offensive and bizarre comments," Jindal said.

The Louisiana governor also warned that Republicans were too associated with "big business, big banks, big Wall Street bailouts, big corporate loopholes."

"We must not be the party that simply protects the well-off so they can keep their toys," Jindal said. "We have to be the party that shows all Americans how they can thrive."

it's a good strategy: identify something rich people need and want, then wrangle the idiots with fearmongering into supporting that agenda, even if it hurts the poor idiots. they're idiots, they can't even understand they're hurting themselves. so you have people without adequate healthcare for example, screaming low iq fears about obamacare

this doesn't mean there are no intelligent conservative people, they do exist. stupid liberals also exist

but it's just that if you meet a stupid person, they are more likely to be a conservative, because their simplistic dimwitted way of thinking about the world matches conservative ideology more closely

http://www.livescience.com/181...

There's no gentle way to put it: People who give in to racism and prejudice may simply be dumb, according to a new study that is bound to stir public controversy.

The research finds that children with low intelligence are more likely to hold prejudiced attitudes as adults. These findings point to a vicious cycle, according to lead researcher Gordon Hodson, a psychologist at Brock University in Ontario. Low-intelligence adults tend to gravitate toward socially conservative ideologies, the study found.

Slashdot Top Deals

It's a naive, domestic operating system without any breeding, but I think you'll be amused by its presumption.

Working...