Last but not least: Look at getting a committee spun off from your general technology council to analyze the issue, setup meetings and conduct the analysis debate there. One issue you will face is overcoming the bureaucratic inertia that higher ed traditionally has, and one way to accomplish that is through the use of committees. "He who has energy to outlast the committee, is inclined to win."
Also, do not be discouraged if you are turned down. A decision today may not be the same decision rendered during the proverbial tomorrow. Wait a while and under the guise of academic inquisition, have the committee relaunched under a new goal that is similar (and yields your intended results as tertiary victories) in 9-12 months.
If you are interested in the theoretical pinnings of the above, look into research and papers by March and Cohen (1974 I think, not much has changed I'm afraid). Things to consider, best of luck.
disclaimer: I have worked in various levels of general worker and administrative positions in higher ed for just over 5 years, and currently study organization and governance/governing (structure/power) within higher ed.