The most conspicuous organisms have long since been cataloged and fixed on the tree of life, and the ones that remain undiscovered don't give themselves up easily.

Certainly not true if by "conspicuous" they mean "ones you can easily see with the naked eye." Most insect and beetle species are not cataloged yet, and for smaller critters the situation is even worse. Heck, you might even find a new frog species in Manhattan.

He should come home to the United States, and be judged by a jury of his peers

The trouble is, it by no means clear that, if he did could back to the US, he would indeed be judged in a fair trial.

Yes, that is interesting.

But, the funny thing is, if the authors of a study say that it doesn't confirm something, it doesn't confirm that something. If they are not going to step up the plate, I am for sure not going to do it for them.

"Our test campaign can not confirm or refute the claims of the EMDrive but intends to independently assess possible side-effects in the measurements methods used so far."

What more do I need to say?

Oh, wait, we already did.

Carbon 14 dating hasn't been reliable (usable) for wood or other biological material formed since 1950, as open air nuclear testing put a lot of C14 into the atmosphere. This C14 has been slowly leaving the atmosphere, but it's not gone yet.

I think that the writers of the original article were just eager to get some attention, as they surely must have known this.

The Turing test is farcically out of date. AlanTuring couldn't have known this, but we humans are full of wetware that assumes that things that appear to be communicating are in fact communicating. Thus we can be fooled by programs such as Eliza (and its successors), which have no understanding of anything at all.

How can you be experts in something you don't know how to do?

That's actually a dual polarization mode - this is the first spacecraft with a dual-polarization data transmit capability. (And, yes, it does require more power, and so won't be used until they are well past Pluto and can put things on standby.) Even with that, it will take 16 months to get all of the data back.

And moving your decimal places to the left.

The first data download with pictures from the encounter (the "New York TImes" download) will start at 5:00 AM EDT Wednesday. Expect some in the morning, and a lot during the 3:00 PM EDT NASA Press Conference.

And you think ULA, Orbital and Boeing don't?

And, by the way, if you find any debris washed up on the beach (any beach) they want it - call the SpaceX debris recovery hotline, 866-392-0035.

The government is always self-insured. I believe that the private launch companies have to have some basic insurance to get a launch license. Commercial satellites are routinely insured, but that is a business move, not a requirement.

The Orbital failure took out the pad, which was owned by the Commonwealth of Virginia, which had neither insurance nor reserve cash to pay for a new one. That caused a scramble to find the bucks to repair the pad.

Should scientists be more responsible for communicating their results directly to the public?

Most science articles are due to press agents at a lab or University or a journal or working for conference organizer either putting together and sending out press releases or contacting reporters they know (or both), and that is always done in collaboration with the scientists issuing the results. Scientists who have access to such resources should certainly use them. Scientists who don't are at an disadvantage (IMHO) and should spend some time figuring out how this is done. Technical people tend to underrate the difficulty of good public communication; it is not trivial to do it well.

This seems like a new version of the Eliza program with more memory.