Comment Re:And often not that useful/needed (Score 1) 390
EXACTLY
EXACTLY
It's your choice, which would you prefer, the "hardships" of graduate school (LOL) or flipping burgers?
Hell, if you're worried about eating, be a bartender. I tended bar on weekends in school and the kitchen staff hooked me up all the time.
...if you don't have the means and/or resources necessary to live comfortably during that period AND you're not willing to make the sacrifices necessary otherwise - then don't go.
Seriously, wtf is up with people thinking that they should get everything they want all the time?
Agreed, this is known to just about anyone with an interest in nuclear proliferation issues, or the history of post 1948 Israel.
...home?
Most people will put more effort into something that will be public (both out of positive motivation and the negative motivation of shaming.)
Open Source will always, in general, be better than closed source. Again - in general. There are people who will engineer things properly irrespective of whether or not someone will be browsing your github account or checking it out of the company's private server... Too bad there's not more of them
Actually the correct fix...
Instead of applying revisionist views that have no Constitutional basis.
Oh, the irony...
*that people can hear the difference between high quality compressed audio...
There are people who insist that they can hear the difference between 320kbps mp3s (using the highest-quality available compressor) and their uncompressed counterparts
So you can't? And hence you conclude no one can?
Sorry, that is bullshit!
Science and math proves all of these things wrong, yet people still insist they're right.
A contrair! Sciense and math exactly proof that. You have a braindead idea about math and sciense.
You can only hear up to like 20k Herz.
But there are so called overtones, multiples of the base frequency. In this case 40k, 60k, 80k 100k etc.
No human is able to hear 40k and above frequencies, but we all can hear if a 20k frequency is combined with an 40k overtone, or an 100k overtone even. Modern lossy compression algorithms cut off these overtones (as the overtone itself is unhearable)
You, again - quite clearly, claim that "Sciense and math exactly proof" that people can high quality compressed audio and uncompressed audio.
You then claim you can hear frequencies outside of the human range of hearing because they are "combined".
You do not seem to realize that you are, at this point, arguing that you can hear overtones through what you refer to as being "combined" but that compression algorithms cut off these overtones.
As per your usual method of discussing with people you insinuated that the person you were replying to was "braindead" (your other preferred term is "idiot".) I applied your own negative terms to you because you used the non-sensical "combined".
Reading all of your posts it is clear that English is not your first language and that you don't understand that when you talk to other people who are detail oriented that it isn't their responsibility to figure out what you meant to say but simply to deal with what you did say.
I did not say anything about mp3s.
You didn't say anything about hearing the differences between "320kbps mp3s (using the highest-quality available compressor) and their uncompressed counterparts"?
Well, we know that isn't true.
And I told you that three or four times now.
Are you a crazy person?
Always draw your curves, then plot your reading.