I think any movie that focuses on two people talking is going to be boring so I wouldn't choose to watch it

A movie doesn't have to "focus" on this to pass the test. It literally needs to have a single scene in which two women talk to each other about something other than a man. It could be a 30-second conversation about how they're going to defuse a bomb. It's a stupidly easy test to pass, and most media doesn't pass it, because most stories are about men and about how everything in the entire movie relates to those men.

I like how you equate "uneducated and living in poverty" with "retarded."

You really are completely blind to your own privileges, aren't you?

Fair enough. Yeah, generally speaking, I try to default to whatever language the individual in question would prefer, since there are some differences of opinion regarding what language to use around these issues.

I was mostly just curious about your intentions, because I don't hear the phrase "gender confused" very often.

That's an article for "Gender Identity Disorder" that you were redirected to after using the search term "Gender Confused." Which indicates that "Gender Confused" is not an official medical term, and I've seen it used in a lot of contexts which are dismissive or invalidating to people whose gender expression does not match their gender assigned at birth.

I'm intensely curious to know what you mean by "gender confused."

where you will be 100% safe

Sounds like you've never been to prison.

Proportional typefaces were invented for a reason, you insensitive clod.

You can't just take the logic in one situation and apply it to another completely different situation. That's now how these things work.

Do you have an actual citation for that?

Well, it certainly didn't take long to figure out what you're all about.

It's funny when you engage with someone who demonstrates a lack of sensitivity, and less than three comments later, they're sending you links to an anti-feminist rag that has little credibility and a transparent agenda.

Welcome to Slashdot -- where a distinction between the definition of "misanthrope" and "sociopath" gets modded to +5 Insightful, and discussions about the actual article are modded as flamebait.

I suppose that you don't mind when people use "lynching" as a metaphor, either? Because, if so, then I'd also suppose that you never had a grandparent who was actually lynched, huh?

Fuck you, buddy. I have yet to a a single conversation about women's issues where some asshole like you doesn't barge in and start yelling "WHY AREN'T WE TALKING ABOUT THE ISSUES THAT AFFECT ME, AS A MAN!?"

Oh, for fuck's sake. Your post was basically a bunch of whining about how people can't talk about women's issues, because men have it bad too, or something.

Here's the thing: sexist, patriarchal bullshit is harmful to men AND women. So the "sexist status quo" is damaging to everyone. If you actually are interested in learning about how sexism is damaging to men (which it sounds like you are), you'd probably be interested in a documentary by Jackson Katz called "Tough Guise."