Looking to score the next Score:5, Funny
Then stop making Score: 5, Insightful comments!
As this story has been submitted several times in the past several days, by various submitter and is going around various other tech forums( https://news.ycombinator.com/i... , https://soylentnews.org/articl... , https://www.reddit.com/r/progr...
Having any integrity system does not mean they're attempting to draw out frauds and destroy them.
You've got to be kidding. Part of what research integrity departments do is prevent/expose fraud. RI departments are ubiquitous in academia, and plenty of effort is being expended policing research. Claiming no one is trying is simply not supported by the facts.
As to unqualified opinions... please cite what you'd like qualified
I believe I've been pretty clear. If you're going to assert that science is rife with fraud and unethical behavior - a claim that isn't supported by anything in the source articles - you should back up your assertion with something more substantial than "because I say so". Otherwise, your argument carries little weight.
Because I can see they're not trying.
Give me examples to the contrary.
Did you read the last sentence of my post? The mere existence of research integrity departments indicates *someone* is trying. In any case, you are the one claiming fraud/unethical behavior is the root cause of the problem. It is up to you to support that claim.
To say that because Horton isn't talking about what I am talking about that I'm somehow not entitled to hold a given opinion or make a given argument is irrational.
Who said you weren't entitled to your opinion? Not me. I'm merely stating that your opinion carries little weight because you fail to support it with anything beyond "take my word for it".
As to his comment not being about fraud, I disagree. Think he's being politically correct.
Perhaps, but anyone publicly denying his words better have *something* to back it up. The fact is, you are not merely putting words in his mouth, you are elevating your inserted words *over* what the man actually said.
Do you see?
What I see is a lot of talk..
You know that or you are a fool.
Just because I don't subscribe to your OPINIONS doesn't make me a fool. Back up your claims and I will consider changing my mind.
But I suspect you're going to remain hostile, closed minded, and dismissive. If your conduct remains in that vein, I'll just take you less seriously.
If you think that challenging your unsupported claims qualifies as hostility, you should probably stay off the internet. If you want to open my mind, support your claims with something stronger than "because I said so".
SourceForge, the code repository site owned by Slashdot Media, has apparently seized control of the account hosting GIMP for Windows on the service, according to e-mails and discussions amongst members of the GIMP community—locking out GIMP's lead Windows developer. And now anyone downloading the Windows version of the open source image editing tool from SourceForge gets the software wrapped in an installer replete with advertisements.
...does the definition of a panorama require that the viewpoint stay in one place and look outwards?...
Yes.
Always draw your curves, then plot your reading.