in about 8 years, give or take, we will see him as the GOP candidate?
And distro maintainers had to pick it or forgo "the" desktop for Linux, Gnome. And even if you don't use Gnome directly, more and more of its internals are likely to depend on something that depends on Systemd, thanks to everything from Freedesktop.org is being scarfed up.
That old Mafia line about a deal you can't refuse comes to mind...
>Booting is compartmentalized to allow for easy debugging(Items report success or failure individually, in order, and with consistency).
Only to have it go "here is a login promp, you're on your own" because of vestigial line in fstab that the traditional mount would just present you with a error for and move on.
Every game I see boxed in a store, or even on Steam for that matter, do not have a PC icon on them anywhere.
They have a windows logo and/or an apple logo (and on rare occasion a tux penguin logo along with the other two)
What game(s) have you seen with only "PC" or equivalent on it?
The USPS has been using automated systems of sorting mail for decades. It's why mail across town goes to a consolidated center (perhaps halfway across the state) first for sorting into carrier routes and has been for decades.
That Homeland Security want to capture this information - which has long been determined to accessible (the original pen-trace) isn't surprising at all.
And they only have to photograph/image the ones that the machines can't read. It's only surprising to people who drink the conservative kool-aide that government can't do anything right.
There are four things government is in a position to do better than anyone else: military defense, law enforcement, public works, and the erosion of liberty.
The legislation prompted a roiling debate in Sacramento, and last week hundreds of people protested at the Capitol, arguing that it infringed on their rights and that it would unfairly shut their children out of schools
For the moment let's set aside fair vs unfair, and just take their claim at face value. This action is unfair for the purpose of argument.
That said... I fail to see what exactly their problem or complaint actually is.
This small group of people are arguing for the legal right to unfairly engage in germ warfare while attempting to murder other school children and even some adults. The argument is this is perfectly acceptable and should be a protected right.
So with that, these people clearly have NO problems with unfair choices being forced on everyone else, as that is the legal right they are demanding.
So why complain when they get their wish, and we "unfairly" shut their children out of school?
If they have no moral or even legal issues with (their) unfair choices being forced on people (us), why do they complain why the court states there is no moral or legal issues with (our) unfair choices being forced on people (them)?
It has already been established that unfairly infecting other children at school is not only acceptable but should be a legal right, so clearly it is also both acceptable and should be a legal right to unfairly kick their children out of school, exactly as these parents are marching at the capitol to demand.
Obviously the correct answer is that the hypocrisy is strong in these people - it just still somehow amazes me to this day such people don't realize that hypocrites are exactly what they are being.
Yes we know those are all well known and long unfixed problems with IPv4...
But you promised a list of IPv6 weaknesses.
Traditionally "epic" is a literary term meaning a long story or poem (keyword: long)
Perhaps if one considers all the time and effort required to get into space to be in a position to take such a picture, I can see "epic" being a proper description.
I read the title as "old macaroni patent" on first glance.
Well, the constitution does say any American citizen has free travel between areas within the US. So if I was this guy, I'd sue the federal court. Fun fact, because it's a federal issue, he's constitutionally promised a jury of at least 6 people if the suit is for more than $20. At that point, it really doesn't matter what the federal judge says, it's the jury. And since the US is a country of "letter of the law", the federal government is going to have a hell of a time defending this action when the constitution explicitly prohibits it.
Sure thing. All it will cost him is his life savings plus whatever debt he incurs.
Old programmers never die, they just hit account block limit.
