Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:How about "not diamond"? (Score 1) 79

Diamond is characterized by each carbon bonding with 4 other carbons. You can't get a thread out of it.

Not that this is a diamond - the paper doesn't use the word, apparently - but doesn't that depend how you define "thread"? I don't see anything in the summary about the size of these things, so what if they're 100 atoms thick? At what thickness could they no longer be diamond?

Comment Re:Wrong approach (Score 1) 50

So, basically you welcome viruses and malware

No, of course not. Why would you think that?

In reality, it is far better to vaccinate and never get sick, than it is to self-repair after you get a virus.

Nice soundbite, until you remember that there aren't vaccines for every single disease (or even better, when you remember the analogy between the immune system and a server is a tenuous one at best)

Comment Re:Huh (Score 1) 223

No, the design and planning were rigorously thought out - certainly rigorously enough to withstand five minutes of bewildered pondering from a Slashdotter after the fact.

The actual problem here is that landing on a comet is really hard.

Why can't it back off and take another run at it?

Ask the guys at ESA. They could probably explain in great detail exactly what the probe is and isn't capable of and why they took the decisions they did after years of planning and cost-benefit analyses. They probably even have graphs.

Slashdot Top Deals

With your bare hands?!?

Working...