Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Internet

President Obama Backs Regulation of Broadband As a Utility 706

vivIsel writes In a move that is sure to generate controversy, the President has announced his support for regulation of broadband connections, including cellular broadband, under Title 2 of the Telecommunications Act. Reclassification of broadband in this way would treat it as a utility, like landline telephones, subject providers to new regulations governing access, and would allow the FCC to easily impose net neutrality requirements.

Comment Re:I remember (Score 2) 231

Um, yes, what's your point? I never said the US was worse than any place else, I just pointed out that it wasn't all that free 1910 as some people believe, it was only free for a certain privileged portion of society.

In addition to that, it wasn't even all that free for white males, depending on where you went. All that stuff in the Bill of Rights (freedom of speech, religion, etc.) didn't even apply until the 1900s sometime. Before that, it was considered as applying only to the Federal government: the Federal government could not pass laws restricting freedom of speech, religion, etc. and force the States to follow them. However, individual States could, and did, have all kinds of anti-freedom laws, official religions, etc. All these people who like to open- or concealed-carry firearms today? Back in the "Old West", there was no such right: any time someone entered a town, they had to surrender their guns to the local sheriff, and could only get them back when they left town.

Comment Re:No. (Score 1) 206

Nope, not everything.

1) Cable companies: since they own the last-mile connections to peoples' homes, they basically have a monopoly on high-speed internet service. Unless you want to use your cellphone for all your internet connectivity, or perhaps you happen to have an alternative like FIOS (which probably isn't any better or cheaper than cable internet), you can't walk away from them.

2) Banks. If people walk away from them, the government will deem them "too big to fail" and give them all the money they ask for.

Comment Re:No. (Score 1) 206

Steve Ballmer wasn't taken very seriously by various Slashdot users, and he ended up getting sacked by the MS board. He also made all kinds of dumb decisions during his tenure (which is why he was sacked, the latest dumb decision being Metro).

CEOs aren't brilliant geniuses, not usually anyway. They're just in the right place at the right time and don't screw up too horribly while they're there, like most successful people.

Comment Re:Hanging around for family (Score 1) 161

The Keys are a chain of islands with a very different culture from the rest of Florida. They even called themselves the "Conch Republic" at one point during a political stunt.

I imagine the weather in Key West is rather different than much of Florida, being a Caribbean island, whereas much of mainland Florida is swamps.

So don't let your experiences in Key West give you the wrong idea about the place where this company is setting up shop (Fort Lauderdale I believe).

Comment Re:Perhaps the answer is taxes (Score 3, Insightful) 161

There's a lot of better states to move than Florida; two of them are directly north of California.

California is an excellent place to be an employee:
1) there's tons of companies there, so if one job doesn't work out, just walk across the street and get a new one.
2) non-compete clauses are unenforceable in California, so employers can't prevent you from working within your industry if you leave that company. The same isn't true in most other states.

There's a reason (or really, many reasons) why Silicon Valley is so successful, and why no one has been able to copy that success though many have tried (like "Silicon Alley" in NYC--what a joke). Many foolish places keep trying to pitch themselves as "the next Silicon Valley", but for most of them it's a pathetic joke because they don't make the changes actually needed to make such a place successful.

Florida is a terrible place to try to set this up for reasons others have stated here: it's a Red State (remember, you're trying to attract hip and well-educated 20- and 30-somethings who are generally non-religious, and a GOP stronghold is not attractive to them), it's full of old people and crazy people, the politics are insane, the weather is terrible (remember, we're talking about people living in the Bay Area, which has excellent mild weather), and of course, it's not already a tech hub unlike places like Boston, Seattle, or RTP, so if this job doesn't work out, they'll have to move back to California. The whole idea is just dumb.

Comment Re:The answer (Score 1) 441

Yep, the open-borders advocates never think about that one. The Native Americans didn't enforce their borders very well (not that they had the firepower to do so anyway), and now where are they? Same goes for the Australian Aboriginees. Both are second-class citizens in their own ancestral lands.

Comment Re:The answer (Score 1) 441

It's called a JOB for a reason. It is work...you get paid for it, and nothing else.

If you want feelings time, and camaraderie, or ego stroking, go to a therapist or a bar with friends.

Or, you can quit the job and go to a job that cares a little more about their employees' feelings and happiness.

If there's no shortage of available workers for this job, then your employers with your attitude are probably OK; they can kick out people who need more hand-holding and find people who fit in well. However, if there is a shortage of quality workers for this job, and it's not just some brain-dead no-thinking job that any monkey could do, then employers with your attitude will quickly find, unless they're paying top dollar salaries, that they can't keep good employees around, and without employees, they can't produce any product and will quickly go under.

Slashdot Top Deals

Happiness is twin floppies.

Working...