Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!
In fact, I'd go so far as to say our problem isn't going to be having too many babies, it's going to be having enough of them.
Several advanced nations have already fallen well below replacement level (i.e., roughly 2 births per female). The USA is even one of those nations at 1.88 births per woman as of 2012. Some places are even worse, like South Korea at 1.3, a rate at which if it continues, the South Korean population would be gone by 2700 or so (though of course, see previous statement on extrapolation). It's true for pretty much every sufficiently advanced nation. The USA and many of these countries have started replacing their population via immigration (which is why the US population is still growing despite the slowing birth rate), but that's only going to work for so long...
Because it's spreading. In 1970, Mexico's birth rate was 6.72 per female. In 2012, it had fallen to 2.22. What about India? 5.49 in 1970, 2.50 in 2012. Yes, it's still pretty high in some of the most undeveloped nations, but that will change, not because governments enforce it, but because on the whole people want it.
No, the people that "didn't realize this" are the politicians and proponents of the DMCA and other horrible laws like it, and the others who bought the line of BS being fed to them by those proponents - the people who dismissed such objections as the being "outlandish," "preposterous," or similarly unrealistic. We tried to tell them, and they ignored us.
Now, I suppose you could propose curtailing appeals and hurrying on to the imposition of the death sentence - but are we really comfortable with that given all the instances where the Justice system has clearly failed, and sometimes spectacularly? It doesn't seem like a week goes by before we hear of another story of some egregious action on the part of law enforcement. This past week was the news that the FBI had been presenting hair sample analysis overstated the evidence in 95% of the trials that had been reviewed, which included 32 death penalty cases.
What I suspect is much more common is that the retail game introduces them to Steam, and along the way they start purchasing games, probably in the various Steam Sales.
This is all about understanding the profiles of different users, and setting it up so that you don't impact 99.n+% of legitimate users, but significantly impact bots/scams/etc.
What this seems to be largely about though is restructuring their internal codes. Pretty much every job in the military or government, civilian or otherwise, has a particular job code and career field, from park ranger to law enforcement to, yes, Special Forces (which is 18 series for the Army). When they talk about "Cyber Branch 17" that's what they mean, it's the designation for that series of military occupational specialties (MOS), just like 11 is infantry, 12 is combat engineer, etc.
Now, on the civilian side, one of the problems the government in general has had is that they don't/didn't have a career field for "Cyber." Everyone that I met was being shoehorned in either as an Intelligence billet or as a general IT billet, neither of which apply quite correctly, as IT Security has focuses and training that would not apply to the majority of the jobs previously classified as those fields, at least in the sense that the Government does. Someone might have 10+ years of experience as either, but know absolutely nothing about advanced IT security.
Able was an air burst, and for the most part the ships survived, partly because it missed its target, the Battleship Nevada, though it was judged based on the data that the Nevada would have been a floating coffin from the radiation. So the ships got hosed down and the second test, Baker, was conducted, with a nuke detonated some 90 feet below the water, which not only sunk multiple ships, but sprayed the radioactive byproducts pretty much everywhere, and it got into everything on all the ships, to the point that they had to cancel the third test because it was judged impossible to clean them up at that point.
So in short, they intended to clean up the surviving ships and recycle them, but the nature of the test served to make that impossible.
In fact, let's we have a rocket powered drone, that has its own guidance systems, and an explosive charge, that is trying to hit the jet, or come reasonably close to it and explode that charge, in order to destroy the jet.
On the other hand, what about Anita Sarkeesian? Can we really say she's been responded to in any sort of rational way? No, what the public sees is a bunch of juvenile attempts to shout down a critic. We're not even talking about how inappropriate rape or death threats are, we're talking about how counterproductive it is to let the conversation change over to that, rather than pointing out how she's wrong, her criticisms are overblown and uninformed, etc. Hell, I would never have even heard of her if it wasn't for the threats and harassment, because THAT'S the story the media keyed in on.
That's why her accusations stuck, not because anyone was evaluating them on any merits, but because a bunch of trolls turned it into a conversation about her being attacked, which caused people to take her side. I'm sure it helped that she was in the role of "feminist critic under attack" rather than "overly litigious lawyer" and thus much more sympathetic in nature, but the ultimate point is that the Gamergate trolls' behavior isn't just objectionable on its own merits, it's also proved rather counterproductive.