And for the most of the french population and in particular journalists, the USA has no left, only two right wing parties.

Now go away or I shall taunt you a second time!

I'm a dual national & have lived in the USA and France (Paris for the last 35).

For the proof of french journalists political orientation, I need only look back at my experiences, among them doing support for la nouvelle obs. In particular I point to the acceptation without any criticism of the extraordinarily anti-American Thierry Meysson who was the toast of every news/press outlet for over 6 months. Even today, years after his lies were shown to be complete fabrications they pop up regularly across the board of France's political spectrum.

So, you can take your typically "I /am/ french" & other assumptions & stick them where they belong.

What?!? If we really kept the government in check, the authors of "Responsable but not guilty" would be in jail. If you don't understand the reference, you don't know enough about french politics to be making comments.

They? Who is this they? Ahhh, the lucky few life public transport workers who are in guaranteed life long jobs and can go on strike without any repercussions meanwhile forcing millions of others to spend hours more getting to/from work.

Those who prétend that France is in any way different than the U.S. in stupid internet memes are liars, and I say that as someone who has lived here for 30+ years & tries to ignore as much of these idiotic stories as possible. However, the French "journalists" being in their great majority left of Ché Guevarra have an automatic knee-jerk reaction to everything in modern life that they do not like: Call it American &/or "ultra liberal" so that they can blame it on the USA or the UK.

All hail Amazon, the winner by proxy of this fight

I know a few people that use FB as a way to drum up business but they are generally self employed or in public facing jobs like Musicians announcing a new gig.

For the rest of us who are employees, & it's hard to stress this enough, FaceBook != LinkedIn!

I do not use FB through company ressources, it's for friends & family only. Work relations are through LinkedIn.

The two sets rarely have anything in common & that's how it will stay.

Big Pharma & the HMOs who are making billions more thanks to Obama agree wholeheartedly with you. People who aren't one subject voters enthralled with Obamacare & those paying more for their healthcare, not so much...

Obama doesn't care about Net Neutrality, it's a political move to attempt to look good.

If Obama really cared about Net Neutrality, he wouldn't have waited until he lost both houses & thus any chance of pushing his own legislation through Congress.

Now that Obama & the Dems no longer have the power to determine the legislative agenda, he can pretend to want Net Neutrality without loosing the support of all the MAFIAA contributors in Hollywood.

Woosh. You have absolutely no idea whatsoever how different the UK terrorism risk is to that of the US. You've never visited the UK, never studied the risks, have no idea what the populations at risk are or how many UK/French/American citizens are fighting for ISIS at present but you'll just pull theoretical fuzzy risk evaluations out ouf your ass.

The subject is UK Justice & terrorism risks. You have no knowledge of the subject & nothing intelligent to say so just shut up.

None of your mundane threats are shutting down public transport, causing massive disruptions in public life or getting politicians scared enough for their reelection that they completely reorient government policy. Again, you have no idea what you are talking about & nothing intelligent to say.

What "figures"? "Figures" you pull out of your ass are only "real" to you; boy-child. No references, no reality.

Before denigrating public fear, you need to experience some. I suggest trying to council rape victims. Given your track record here, you're bound to say something like "I've never been raped but I've read statistics that say that...". Their reaction to your drivel will at last give you an idea how stupid your arguing from ignorance is & how debilitating public fear can be.

You know this how, oh ignorant one? Yeah, that's right, you don't, all you know is how to fart while exclaiming "smells like roses".

You have to be abysmally ignorant to think that England's courts have anything to do with America (I'll assume the USA because the ignorant often conflate the two terms) but that's neck beards for you...

As for thinking that ISIS isn't a clear and present dangerous threat, well yet again you display ignorance. The influx of people with western passports (that being the UK, France & even the USA For the ignorant) being trained by ISIS who then return (or are sent back) to the west are the most dangerous threats inside our countries. The USA has been lucky up to now to have avoided attacks on this vector. France, where I live, hasn't, nor has the UK.

I was in Paris during the series of bombings in the Metro in 1995 & my future wife was close enough to the Champs-Élysées bomb to feel the shockwave. I was in the UK during the Tube bombings in 2005. I remember the disruptions to normal life. Even though I, like most people never felt enough sense of personal danger to change how we lived our lives, the shutdown of services like the metro/tube/busses will effect you.

You, on the other hand, cower behind those who are attempting to protect you and are well enough protected by them to ignorantly criticize the work of authorities in countries far away. Your theoretical statistics mean nothing to people with something you do not possess: experience.

Because ISIS, Putin, the London tube bombers & co are all so cute & cuddly.

Ah, so you're one of the fuzzy bunny crowd, criticizing those who are protecting him from the cruel reality he refuses to admit exists. There can be no useful debate with people of your ilk unable or on willing to live in the real world.

Neckbeard indeed...

Then what is it then? From TFA, the "outrage" is that MI5/6 must not be able to spy on journalists or lawyers.

Yes they are hypocrites, which means that their right to spy on everyone is justified & the outrage on being sped upon is fake. You cannot have it both ways.