Submission + - Integrated Circuit Amplifier Breaches Terahertz barrier
In related news, DARPA has also created a micro-machined vacuum power amplifer operating at 850 GHz, or 0.85 THz.
"24-7-365"
I know I am off-topic, but why do people use that phrase?
Shouldn't it be "24-7-approximately 52.18" to avoid redundancy?
Here is a link that seems to support my previous comments: http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/...
It seems that this all about the financial bottom line. I understand things cost money, but it would nice if there was, for once, more concern about human lives.
At the risk of sounding like a conspiracy theorist, I think this particular outbreak is being publicized to create FUD.
There have been outbreaks in the past that weren't nearly so well publicized. I think a few companies are close to having a cure/preventative and are using this FUD to get around a few regulations (we have a cure, but the rotten regulators won't let us use it and you could die because of the red-tape). I am not a fan of red tape, but to try to circumvent it for purely pecuniary reasons is not good, either.
There are no "standards". Things will eventually work together, but it'll cost you - or the Non-MS company. "Standards" is a buzzword to lull us into thinking that companies think about the end users and not just the bottom line.
I think most of your small ones are legitimate. "Tax system gamer" is hardly applicable, as the taxing agencies know how to get around the "tax-exempt" status. Even non-profits must generate some profit just to maintain. Most of them have no "paid" executives. Just a handful of people trying to carry out the mission of helping others. So, please, do help the small ones, if you are so inclined. They need all the help they can get.
Some of the Big Ones, I agree, are a little shady.
"new NEO?"
Is this a built-in redundancy?
I don't see why not. A 1.21 gigawatt power supply has been around for years.
Yes, the consulting hours are a very lucrative incentive to have a "non-standard" standard. Our laboratory had a LIS installed. The EHR company charged alot of money to build an interface so the Lab Information could be sent to the EHR. So when our Radiology department installed a RIS, the EHR company charged alot of money to build a similar interface. As we went along in this process, it became apparent the the EHR company just "copied and pasted" the Radiology interface from the Lab interface. There was some "fine tuning" done so the Radiology system would quit getting Lab orders and vice versa. The Radiology results in the EHR look very similar to Lab results, which is not good, as Radiology reports are text notes, and the Lab results are numbers with reference ranges.
The HL7 "standard" has been perverted to make some companies very rich.
DICOM is the same way
"Engineering without management is art." -- Jeff Johnson