Maybe examiners realized that the patents system is too complex and by virtue of being able to make self references, there will always be Gödel attack vectors against it, therefore making the effort to validate any patent as worthwhile ultimately vain ?
...
Nah... there must be a simpler explanation :)

They are talking about entangled states, so yes there is something 'instantaneous' (spooky action at a distance) but it indeed does not violate any law of QED.

That's the wrong "Yeah, but"
The real "Yeah, but" is this one:
Yeah, but my gf thinks it tastes bad when I drink too much coffee, therefore
Four Cups of Coffee A Day Cuts Risk of Oral Sex
I'm so sorry but the balance is just not there

I'm not sure you can really make a man-in-the middle attack, the summary must be mistaken cause I don't think this technology is 50 years old.
This is "line of site" microwave technology, I suppose it allows them to communicate insanely fast from "sight to cite", that is to say, allowing them to spread information at the speed of rumor, the fastest known way to communicate in the universe. Any man in the middle attack attempt would add a noticeable lag.

"Researchers Find Crippling Flaws In Global GPS" is misleading ?
Oh I see the flaw is not really in the global GPS system, thanks a lot for your post, I don't even have to read the fucking TFA thanks to you
(I had mod points for you but you are already at +5 (twice) so...)

You don't have to RTFA to find out
The hilarious video makes it quite clear:
The intent is to reproduce tex avery cartoon like effects over people's eyes showing money signs when they see something valueable or some potential client/victim
This is huge, the next step it to force car dealers lawyers etc. to wear them, and ideally the dollars signs should be visible at the apropriate moment (when they are just about to screw you), but for a very good and cheap first approximation, it would work by letting them on all the time

You meant teaching I guess
The difference is quite clear if you see the extremes, that would be like asking what is the difference between white and black when we are observing shades of grey.
So the difference, as a teacher vs programmer , is your level of expectation toward your student / compiler
There is a joke that goes like "this damn compiler is doing exactly what I tell it to instead of what I want it to"
For the student, you do expect it to get what you mean instead of what you say
But of course, there is a grey area

On the plus side, this sensational wording borderlining on inaccurate does make your post sound more interesting :)

You might want to have a look at this nice video about the scientific method :)

[citation needed]

Let's just add some more polemic to it
To bad or not to bad, that begs the question...

Thanks for those clarifications, it makes much more sense now
Some video footage of the whole mess for people needing some more clarifications about the subtleties of this trial

I understand
In death, an agent of project Itanium has a name
His name is Robert Poulson

Your parent was clearly in a hurry
(S)He meant ROFLYSST

What you are describing is correct, but it just is the classical doppler effect
For relativistic speeds, time dilation also enters the scene
For example, if the source moves in circles around you, you are not to expect any classical doppler effect, but there would be a relativistic one completely due to the time dilation effect
More about it here