What is the logic behind that?
Protection for the incumbent providers, sold as protection for the consumer
Typical pitch: don't rent from an unlicensed provider. There could be bedbugs or poor service, or it might be a fire trap or something.
Typical reality: You are lucky to escape alive with bed bugs and food poisoning when the licensed provider burns down.
Kinda funny this is what became of the original gold rush town, where anything went. Airbnb, lyft, etc... kinda like Napster and YouTube in meat space. They know their business model is an attack on the incumbents. Everybody is just shuffling the shit around, hoping they can shovel it onto somebody else and get out of town in time. OK... maybe it really is still a gold rush town on that level. Anyway, I'm not directly involved so I'll just pop the popcorn.