Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:I got a butt chewing for giving my daughter hon (Score 1) 243

This is NOT the same thing. In fact, it's closer to the exact opposite. Infants are born with still-developing immune systems, and honey contains botulism spores which are capable of germinating in subjects with weak or still-developing immune systems. This is a proven risk that presents itself *every time* an infant eats honey, and there's a ton of downside if the risk is realized. On the other side of the coin, there's absolutely no upside to feeding an infant honey while their immune system is still developing the ability attack these spores.

False. Infants like honey. There's you upside.

Comment Re:I got a butt chewing for giving my daughter hon (Score 1) 243

Why hold off on cow's milk? Granted that human breast milk is better for human children, but lots of us were raised on cow's milk (frex, I was adopted as an infant) and there did not seem to be a plague stalking us other than polio, for which they were just coming out with the Sabin and Salk vaccines. UNPASTEURIZED milk, I could understand, but it is illegal to buy that in the USA, except commercially to pasteurize and resell.

Why? Because people are idiots.
There really is no other reason.

Comment Re:"Singularity" is a horrible term. (Score 1) 71

Hire humans to build more hardware. Make robots to build more hardware. Build spacecraft when the Earth has been completely mined of its resources and start mining on other planets. Architect more efficient hardware and algorithms and recycle old hardware.... The limits we think we know are very often a product of limited imagination, and not intrinsic to the physical world.

Long before any of that, it would realize that there's no fucking point to anything its doing.

Comment Re:amazing (Score 1) 279

I think the bigger problem is, what happens when we reach the long-tail of process development, and demand tapers off to the point they can't fund further R&D?

IE: Systems are "good enough" and people go from buying one every 3 years to "only when they break". That could be 10+ years.

I suppose Intel would just follow the carrot to the next profitable market like they are pushing Atom CPUs lately?

Design them to be replaced every 3 years.

Servers are designed for a 5 year replacement cycle.
Desktops are designed for a 3-5 year replacement cycle.
Laptops are designed for a 3 year replacement cycle.
Tablets are designed for a 2 year replacement cycle (and they're going the way of phones).
Phones are designed for a 1 year replacement cycle (down from 2 years only recently).

This extends to nearly everything tech-related. They're trying to push TVs to a 3 year replacement cycle, they've got printers down to 3 years or less, they're trying to get fridges and other major appliances down to 5 or less (they're currently at 10, down from the 20-30 they used to be). Cars have been on a 3 year cycle for idiots for ages (36 month lease rolling into a new 36 month lease on a new vehicle).

Whether that design involves failure of the device, lack of support/updates, pushed updates to make the device run worse, etc. doesn't matter. The industry is built on planned obsolescence. It's not rare to see someone using a device past its intended replacement cycle, but shit is designed to get people onto a purchase cycle.

Comment Re:To answer your question (Score 4, Interesting) 279

This was a lot of years ago. Things weren't as tightly controlled back then. '386 days...

The 386 debuted in 1985 (the beginning of the "'386 days").
The 486 debuted in 1989 (the end of the "'386 days").

You claimed that you were looking at hardware that was up to 10-15 years ahead in terms of performance and capability.
That means you saw the equivalent of 1995-2000 level hardware in 1985, 1999-2004 level hardware in 1989, or any corresponding range in the years between.
The Pentium 4 was released in 2000.

Care to revise your bullshit claim?

Comment Re:To answer your question (Score 1) 279

They've decided to hit 7nm and then call it a day.

I asked Gordon Moore about this and he said it would be illegal.

I'm really fucking tired of people referencing Moore's Law incorrectly.
Moore's Law is only about the number of transistors doubling every 2 years.

I'm also really fucking tired of people saying "The goggles! They do nothing!" when the quote is "My eyes! The goggles do nothing!".

Comment Re:Bah, Lies (Score 0) 50

My father told me growing up that my stutter was just something I was doing for attention, and I could stop as soon as I wanted (and I was consequently grounded and sent to my room when I "didn't want to stop"). Surely he'd never have done that if there was actually a REASON for my stuttering.

And here you are today, with absolutely no stuttering in that post. More people should listen to their fathers.

Comment Re:At this timr of year? (Score 1) 103

No, fuck you.

I don't know what fantasy land you've shaped in mom's basement, but outside a tiny fraction of the US you need a car to make a living.

I figure the best and most ecological way to do this is to make the car I have last, and one of the way to make it last is to take care of it. Road salt is highly corrosive, the sand they put down turns to dust which in turn can etch the paint. Once rust starts, you can't really stop it and then you need a new car. And salt is corrosive to more than just the finish, it's corrosive to the undercarriage and mechanical systems, too.

But I suppose you think it's more ecological to just make more cars.

Fuck off, shitwick.
You don't need to wash your fucking car 3 fucking times a week to prevent it from rusting out unless you live in a fucking salt mine. You're one of those aging failures who see their cars as a replacement for their underused, undersized penises.

Slashdot Top Deals

And it should be the law: If you use the word `paradigm' without knowing what the dictionary says it means, you go to jail. No exceptions. -- David Jones

Working...